In Order to Reach Nirvana in Buddhism, There Is No Self

870 Words2 Pages

The Buddhist tradition argues that there is no ātman or self. They believe that concept of a self binds a person to the corporeal world and prevents them from reaching nirvāṇa. In the Buddhist tradition what people believe to be the self is really a collection of the five aggregates. These aggregates are the senses which we experience the world through and they give us a false sensation of individuality. If a person lets go of these aggregates they can achieve nirvāṇa and leave the cycle of rebirth. However, Buddhists do believe that something survives after death. This is reflected is the Buddhist belief that when someone dies they become reincarnated in one of the six realms based on their past karma. The soul however is not what is reincarnated; rather there is a stream of consciousness between one life to the next. The reincarnated being is neither completely the same nor totally different. The Buddha taught that a middle ground must be followed between eternalism and annihilationism.
Outside of the Buddhism the belief in an eternal self or a soul is a fairly common, this is called eternalism. Many religions including Hinduism, Islam, and Christianity believe in an eternal soul. This belief is in fact a central idea in their practitioners’ belief system. Without an eternal soul a Hindu cannot follow the cycle of birth, death and rebirth, a Christian cannot go to Heaven or Hell and a Muslim cannot go to Jannah or Jahhanam.
Another belief is that of annihilationism. The idea behind annihilationism is that upon death nothing survives. Both the body and the soul are destroyed and there is no form of rebirth or reincarnation. Annihilationism is a belief held by both materialists and some Christians. Materialists believe that noth...

... middle of paper ...

...and you still retain your identity therefore something must be providing that identity. This does argument does a good job of disputing Nagasena’s argument for no self. My argument counters that one by showing that something without a soul retains its identity despite losing one of its parts, this reinforces Nagasena’s argument. Something’s self is fabricated upon impermanent traits that do not transcend death.
Nagasena’s argument follows the Buddhist belief system by maintaining a middle ground between the eternalist view of the soul and annihilationism. Neither does the soul exist nor is it impossible for the stream of consciousness between individuals in the cycle of rebirth to occur. Since consciousness is one of the five aggregates following Nagasena’s argument still allows for the Buddhist concept of reincarnation through a stream of consciousness to be true.

More about In Order to Reach Nirvana in Buddhism, There Is No Self

Open Document