Importance Of International Relations

1680 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: International relations and diplomacy

International relations were introduced since 3,500 BC. Barry Buzan and Richard Little in their book “International system in world history” argue that international relations were present during the ancient Sumerians. During the Sumerian times there were city-states , and between these city-states there would be international relations like trade, peace treaties, etc. The term international relations was introduced during the Peloponnesian war there was international relations shown to us in the “The Melian conference” were we saw the Athenians and the Melians discussing the terms of surrender. International relations were often traced back to the “Peace of Westphalia” which was in 1648. Between 1500-1789 we saw a significant rise in sovereign states which marked the increase of international relations between these states. During the French revolution the idea of an autonomous state was introduced. A rule by the people and for the people, but can international relations is effective without an influential central institution that governs the state?
The Hobbesian/Machiavellian tradition, the Grotian/Lokean tradition and the Kantian tradition are three different traditions, which need to be looked at carefully in order to answer this question. These traditions were formulated in different time periods. They obviously have different perspectives on international relations and have different views on the significance of the law.
Thomas Hobbes was influenced by both Rene Descartes and Galileo Galilei. Thomas Hobbes met them while he was living in France and Italy. He published his famous book “Leviathan” while he was living in England during the civil war in England. In chapter 13 of his book “Leviathan” he talks about the “state ...

... middle of paper ...

...nditures”. Also this idea was stressed on in the “Bill of Rights” as he argued that “The state of peace must therefore be established, for the suspension of hostilities does not provide the security of peace, and unless this security is pledged by one neighbour to another …, the latter, from whom such security has been requested, can treat the former as an enemy”. Kant argued that states are not the only actor responsible for maintaining peace, but also the citizens that live in each state. As Kant expressed his views on democracy, here we can see that his idea of democracy also involved the people of a state in the decision making of that specific state. Kant’s work on the “Eternal Peace” helped Woodrow Wilson vision in establishing the League of Nations. Also in our modern times his work on the “Eternal Peace” helped also in the establishment of the UN charter.

Show More
Related

  • The Influence of Locke and Hobbes on Government

    1741 Words  | 4 Pages

    The foremost aspects to consider from the Leviathan are Hobbes’s views on human nature, what the state of nature consists of, and what role morality plays. Hobbes assumes, taking the position of a scientist, that humans are “bodies in motion.” In other words, simple mechanical existences motivated solely to gain sati...

    Read More

  • Comparing John Locke and Thomas Hobbes

    1242 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are two political philosophers who are famous for their theories about the formation of the society and discussing man in his natural state. Their theories are both psychologically insightful, but in nature, they are drastically different. Although they lived in the same timeframe, their ideas were derived from different events happening during this time. Hobbes drew his ideas on man from observation, during a time of civil strife in Europe during the 1640's and 1650's.

    Read More

  • The United States Illogical Practice of Democratic Peace Theory in the Middle East

    2255 Words  | 5 Pages

    The idea of a lasting, ideally global, peace has been present in the minds of people for centuries. The most notable formulation of this is Kant’s vision of perpetual peace. “He saw it as a condition that needed to be maintained by politics between states with governments which represented society and separation of power. From this basic framework stems the idea called “democratic peace theory” (pg. 82). Democratic Peace Theory (DPT) asserts that democracies do not generally fight other democracies because they share common norms and domestic institutions that constrain international, state actors from going to war. Sebastian Rosato states, “In practical terms democratic peace theory provides the intellectual justification for the belief that spreading democracy abroad will perform the dual task of enhancing American national security promoting world peace” (pg. 585).

    Read More

  • The State of Nature: Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury

    1681 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hobbes, T. (1839-45) The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury; Now First Collected and Edited by Sir William Molesworth, Bart. Vol. 3. Leviathan. London: Bohn. Accessed via: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/hobbes-the-english-works-vol-iii-leviathan

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Thomas Hobbes

    1766 Words  | 4 Pages

    He started out on with philosophy of political science while on his trips and visits to other countries outside of England to listen to other scientists and learn different forms of government. While studying, Thomas Hobbes wondered about why people were allowing themselves to be ruled and what would a great form of government for England. He reasoned that people were naturally wicked and shouldn’t be trusted to govern themselves because they were selfish creatures and would do anything to better their position and social status. These people, when left alone will go back to their evil impulses to get a better advantage over others. So Thomas Hobbes concluded that the best form of government would an absolute monarchy, which is a government

    Read More

  • Individual Liberty: Thomas Hobbes and John Rawls

    2100 Words  | 5 Pages

    ����������� Thomas Hobbes is an important political and social philosopher. He shares his political philosophy in his work Leviathan. Hobbes begins by describing the state of nature, which is how humans coped with one another prior to the existence of government. He explains that without government, �the weakest has the strength to kill the strongest� (Hobbes 507). People will do whatever it takes to further their own interests and protect their selves; thus, creating a constant war of �every man against every man� (Hobbes 508). His three reasons for people fighting amongst each other prior to government include �competition,� �diffidence,� and �glory� (Hobbes 508). He explains how men fight to take power over other people�s property, to protect them selves, and to achieve fame. He describes life in the state of nature as being �solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short� (Hobbes 508). Hobbes goes on to say that if men can go on to do as they please, there will always be war. To get out of this state of nature, individuals created contracts with each other and began to form a government.

    Read More

  • Comparing Thomas Hobbes And Locke's Theory Of Government

    1460 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two English philosophers who were very similar thinkers. They both studies at Oxford, and they both witnessed the civil Revolution. The time when they lived in England influenced both of their thoughts as the people were split into two groups, those whom though the king should have absolute power, and the other half whom thought people could govern themselves. However Hobbes and Locke both rejected the idea of divine right, such as there was no one person who had the right from God to rule. They both believed in the dangers of state of nature, they thought without a government there is more chance of war between men. However their theories differ, Hobbes theories are based on his hypothetical ideas of the state

    Read More

  • Understanding International Relations

    1517 Words  | 4 Pages

    To understand the international relations of contemporary society and how and why historically states has acted in such a way in regarding international relations, the scholars developed numerous theories. Among these numerous theories, the two theories that are considered as mainstream are liberalism and realism because the most actors in stage of international relations are favouring either theories as a framework and these theories explains why the most actors are taking such actions regarding foreign politics. The realism was theorized in earlier writings by numerous historical figures, however it didn't become main approach to understand international relations until it replaced idealist approach following the Great Debate and the outbreak of Second World War. Not all realists agrees on the issues and ways to interpret international relations and realism is divided into several types. As realism became the dominant theory, idealistic approach to understand international relations quickly sparked out with failure of the League of Nation, however idealism helped draw another theory to understand international relations. The liberalism is the historical alternative to the realism and like realism, liberalism has numerous branches of thoughts such as neo-liberalism and institutional liberalism. This essay will compare and contrast the two major international relations theories known as realism and liberalism and its branches of thoughts and argue in favour for one of the two theories.

    Read More

  • European Enlightenment

    627 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes wrote a book about his ideas called the Leviathan. In his book he argued that people were naturally cruel, greedy and selfish. He thought that if people were not strictly controlled, they would fight, rob and oppress one another. He believed society must be ruled by an Absolute Monarch.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes and the Realist School

    732 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hobbes was a strong believer in the thought that human nature was evil. He believed that “only the unlimited power of a sovereign could contain human passions that disrupt the social order and threatened civilized life.” Hobbes believed that human nature was a force that would lead to a constant state of war if it was not controlled. In his work the Leviathan, he laid out a secular political statement in which he stated the significance of absolutism.

    Read More

  • International Relations

    2631 Words  | 6 Pages

    ...th 2001). Roth argues that the concept of international jurisdiction is not a new idea but was exercised by the US government in the 1970 after an aircraft hijacking. Also the war crime courts established after the end of World War II exercised international jurisdiction. In fact the Geneva Convention states that is a person regardless of their nationality should be brought before the court of any state in which that person has committed grave breaches of law and convention. Roth states that the concept of international jurisdiction is not a new one but that only in recent years have states been willing to act on universal jurisdiction and go after criminals of the international community regardless of their stating or power within the international community. Roth believes in the ability and authority of international organizations and institutions (Roth 2001).

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Leviathan By Thomas Hobbes

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), who was known as an English philosopher who wrote the book: The Leviathan to point out the flaws of all mankind also to show how evil humans are, The Leviathan is an evil sea monster as Thomas Hobbes compared and described all human kind as Leviathan’s, Thomas Hobbes was also well known that he criticized states and governments in his Leviathan’s book as he pointed out all the flaw as well as given demands to higher states with no shame or worriedness. After the publish of his book people started wondering on why did he have an evil perspective of all human kind, some said it was due to the fact that he was born in harsh circumstances such as wars and conflicts ( English civil war) which made him think so harshly

    Read More

  • International Relations Essay

    1095 Words  | 3 Pages

    The study of international relations takes a wide range of theoretical approaches. Some emerge from within the discipline itself others have been imported, in whole or in part, from disciplines such as economics or sociology. Indeed, few social scientific theories have not been applied to the study of relations amongst nations. Many theories of international relations are internally and externally contested, and few scholars believe only in one or another. In spite of this diversity, several major schools of thought are discernable, differentiated principally by the variables they emphasize on military power, material interests, or ideological beliefs. International Relations thinking have evolved in stages that are marked by specific debates between groups of scholars. The first major debate is between utopian liberalism and realism, the second debate is on method, between traditional approaches and behavioralism. The third debate is between neorealism/neoliberalism and neo-Marxism, and an emerging fourth debate is between established traditions and post-positivist alternatives (Jackson, 2007).

    Read More

  • Connection is Key: International Relations Intertwined

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    international politics (politics in general) are objective to be interpreted by one's own understanding of

    Read More

  • The Importance Of International Organizations

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although, international organizations are largely influenced by the powerful states they contain and reflect those states’ interests, international organizations provide essential forums for communication, and encourage education of new international norms, which in turn, shape the interests and behaviors of states.

    Read More

More about Importance Of International Relations

Open Document