Igor Stravinsky's Rite Of Spring

1581 Words4 Pages

The Modernism movement brought about profound and all-encompassing changes in society affecting not only art, but literature and music as well. Much of its cause can be attributed to historical reasons, particularly the tumultuous happenings of the early 1900’s. After the atrocities of the Great War, many people were left questioning what they knew and had once thought. Much of this questioning resulted in radical changes of the Modernist movement. Artists, composers, and authors alike now sought to create works that mirrored the chaos of the period they lived in. Moving sharply away from the normality of the period, they created something people had never seen before. Much like the time period itself, these new creations were met with resistance …show more content…

Composed and debuted at an unsettling time, many did not receive Stravinsky’s new work well. In completing his work, Stravinsky took a sharp turn away from previous eras of music, instead turning towards the evolving idea of chaos provided by the newfound modern era. At first listen, many were not ready for this radical change. On its opening night, a riot ensued in the theater as many protested it and claimed that it was not real music. Upon hearing it performed the first time for myself in Paris, I immediately came to understand how it would be considered chaotic and how the audience would not receive it well. Although not a musical expert, I do have some background in music; it was clear to me that the tones were dissonant and the tune did not follow the crowd-pleasing formula that many of the previous works we had heard did. With his work, Stravinsky seemed to have created a gap between the artist and the audience. His work did not appear to be created to please the audience for it did not follow the previously typical aesthetic formula that people …show more content…

The relationship I felt with Stravinsky, as a listener, related quite clearly with what Ortega had been saying about Modern artists. While listening to his work, I was not only filled with a sense of indubitable chaos, but also, was overtaken by a feeling of panic. While creating his work in the new era, he brushed aside the human element and what people found to be aesthetic, hereby “dehumanizing” his work and creating something that was perceived as “unaesthetic” and therefore “not music” when it was performed on opening night. The regular emotions such as love, grief, and joy that people were used to receiving while listening to music were not present. As a result, the audience could not understand this new work. Having listened to the works of previous composers during my time in Paris, Stravinsky’s work provided a sharp and obvious contrast. The relationship between the artist and the listener that composers had always seemingly abided by had ended. Stravinsky’s work no longer seemed to be concerned with pleasing the listener, but rather, simply created a vast amount of chaos for the audience leaving them feeling the effects of this new tumultuous era that they were living in. The gap between the composer and the listener was now

Open Document