Ignorance In Edwin Abbott's Flatland

933 Words2 Pages

In Edwin Abbott Abbott’s famous masterpiece of scientific fiction, Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensiosn, A. Square introduces his readers to a fascinating world consisting of only two dimensions. Our scholarly guide explains the inner societal workings of Flatland, providing detailed and insightful accounts of the history, culture, and traditions of him and his people. Afterwards, A. Square is transported in his dreams to a one-dimensional world called Lineland. Our persistent protagonist tenaciously attempts to convince the monarch of Lineland to recognize the existence of a second dimension but to no avail. Soon after, A. Square himself is visited by a being hailing from Spaceland, a world with three dimensions. After much internal intellectual …show more content…

Square’s interactions with Pointland, Lineland, and Spaceland. The key theme Abbott explores in part two appears to be the theme of ignorance. When A. Square attempts to educate the monarchs of Lineland and Pointland, he is met with a great deal of intellectual resistance. The monarchs of Lineland and Pointland were both so convinced of the truths held in their respective worlds that they refused to acknowledge the truths held in other worlds due to their inability to conceive of such complexities. It is easy to pass judgement on these monarchs and deride them for their stubborn ignorance and closed-mindedness, but upon further reflection, our human world is no different. People in the seventeenth century stubbornly refused to consider Galileo’s championing of heliocentricism and instead jailed him, proclaimed him to be a heretic, and retracted into their own comfortable, ignorant bliss. How is that any different than the monarchs of Lineland and Pointland? Or from the way the residents of Flatland persecuted A. Square for enlightening them on the existence of Spaceland? Abbott successfully drives in a core concept here: people are inherently reluctant to accept truths that are inconceivable or incompatible with their current level of knowledge. We don’t know what we don’t know and we don’t want to know that we don’t know. With that in mind, imagine how much knowledge humans could have if we were simply able to accept what we can not conceive. What if everything we know about the world and the universe around us is wrong? What if core concepts such as the law of gravity or thermodynamics or space or time are all inherently wrong? What if? If there exist other dimensions (which according to A. Square’s logic of exponents, there absolutely can be), then how do we know that our truths are applicable across the alternate worlds? More importantly, how

Open Document