I. A DIACHRONIC APPROACH OF THE – ING FORM

841 Words2 Pages

As it is shown in the Contents section, this chapter will be organized in two sub-chapters (The etymology of the ~ing form and respectively, The multiple uses of the -ing form) under the generic title of THE DIACRONIC APPROACH OF THE -ING.
We propose to start with a diachronic approach of the -ing form, beginning with Old English until Modern English. We believe that only by a historical analysis of the -ing phenomenon we can understand its multiple uses and flexibility, consequently, we continue by listing the English – ing forms.
In this chapter we propose to cluster significant data about the origins and development of the -ing, which will be most helpful in the developing and supporting the purpose of this paper.

1.1. The etymology of the ~ing form

Before entering the topic, a distinction between the main approaches to English study, i.e. diachronic vs. synchronic approach is needed. This terminology belongs to the linguist Ferdinand de Saussure, who punctuated the importance of seeing the development of a language from two distinct points of view, which he called “diachronic and synchronic”. Synchronic linguistics sees language as a living whole, existing at a particular point in time, while diachronic linguistics concerns with the language and its historical development. Thus, a synchronic approach refers to the study of a language at a particular period of time, whereas diachronic approach is a historical study of language development.
According to A. Poruciuc (2004), during the last decades, English has been studied mainly form a synchronic-structuralist position, which may be considered as most appropriate for practical and didactic purposes ...

... middle of paper ...

...ll appeared as, ande/-ende. But, during the 14th century those forms were given up in favour of –ynge /- inge, obviously, by analogy with verbal nouns inherited form OE. TC comyng, pouryng have nominal functions; but willenge, tkenge are clearly verbal-participial.
In MnE Period the continuous (progressive) aspect was still unsettled, and even considered ‘ vulgar’ to SMnE prescriptive scholars. It came to be accepted as part of English grammar only during the 19th century, when more and more writers used it in their works. The process of conversion became an easy and dynamic process of creating new words, so by mere shifting of word-order, as well as by specific endings (-s , -ing, ed) , nouns and adjective may become verbs, and verbal forms may be substativized – this is the process where –ing suffix thrives.

1.1.2 The multiple uses of the ~ ing form

Open Document