Huck Finn Passage Analysis

1327 Words3 Pages

Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is considered the great American Novel with its unorthodox writing style and controversial topics. In the selected passage, Huck struggles with his self-sense of morality. This paper will analyze a passage from Adventures of huckleberry Finn and will touch on the basic function of the passage, the connection between the passage from the rest of the book, and the interaction between form and content. The passage takes place in chapter 26. However, to better understand the passage itself, I believe it is necessary for some background information to be told. Huckleberry Finn, the main protagonist in this novel, is travelling with two conmen who calls themselves the Duke and the Dauphin down the Mississippi The oldest sister, Mary Jane, questions Joanna about what she does not believe. Joanna answers with, “He’s told some stretchers, I reckon, and I said I wouldn’t swallow it all; and that’s every bit and grain I did say. I reckon he can stand a little thing like that, can’t he” (Twain 244). The passage then goes on to Huck deciding to steal the gold, hide it, and return the gold to the rightful owners: the daughters of Peter Wilks. The basic function of the passage in relationship with the plot is to show Huck and the development of his moral compass. This in turn helps him decide on what he has to do to protect the innocent orphans of Peter Wilks whom have been nothing but courteous to the three of them imposters. The passage shows a growth in Huck’s intellectual capacity and the maturing of his moral code. Instead of only thinking of himself, Huck starts feeling bad with “letting that old reptle rob her of her money” (Twain 244). The three sisters, Mary Jane, Susan, and Joanna, are depicted as well-mannered girls who were raised correctly and were very hospitable albeit the initial questioning of Joanna due to Huck’s inconsistencies with his story. The setting of this passage is based in the estate of the Late Peter Wilks. The mood of this passage is solemn yet lighthearted. Toward the beginning of the novel, Huck has no problem robbing caravans, kidnapping wealthy people for money, and even killing the families of the gang formed by him and his friends if they became turncoats and told of this gang. He was even disappointed when all the gang did was cause trouble at a Sunday school meeting. Later on in the novel, Huck is also faced with a moral dilemma when he comes across Jim, Miss Watson’s runaway slave. As they travel down the river, huck mentions, “I begun to get it through my head that he was most free—and who was to blame for it? Why, me. I couldn’t get that out of my conscience, no how nor no way. It got to troubling me so I couldn’t rest” (Twain 153). Back in that time, it most certainly would not be a moral dilemma; instead, it would be very simple: bring the slave back to his owner. However, when Jim asked Huck to promise that he wouldn’t tell, Huck replied with, “Well, I did. I said I wouldn’t, and I’ll stick to it. Honest injun I will. People would call me a low down Ablitionist and despise me for keeping mum—but that don’t make no difference. I ain’t agoing to tell” (Twain 103). In the chosen passage, it is very clear that Huck realizes what is happening there, and believes it to be wrong. Huck thinks to himself, “this is another one that I’m letting him rob her of her money. And when she got through, they all just laid

Open Document