Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors affecting working memory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors affecting working memory
A lot of parents and teachers know that problem: The child is inattentive to task instructions or does not show the needed patience in order to solve a complex problem. Over time, this might frustrate parents as well as teachers who sometimes try to find explanations for these behaviours and maybe even assume that the child is “lazy” or just wants to get attention by not following instructions. However, the reason for such kind of limitations is often not intentional but rather due to a low working memory capacity – which children are often not able to compensate for without any specific training. Knowing that some potential working memory trainings for these children already exist, the question emerges whether and why exactly it would make sense to offer these to the general public in the future. Moreover, are there possible alternatives to help these children to keep up with their classmates having a normal working memory capacity?
In order to understand how the capacity of working memory might be improved it is necessary first to define what is meant by working memory. According to the definition by Baddeley and Hitch (1976) working memory is a limited capacity system that actively holds information in mind in which these can be manipulated. It consists of four subsystems: a phonological loop, a visuospatial sketchpad, an episodic buffer and a central executive. The phonological loop has two components: the phonological store in which sounds are stored; and the articulatory control process which automatically refreshes these sounds in a 2-second cycle (Revlin, 2012). Because of this 2-second limitation the following rule applies: the more information to process, the more will be lost from working memory.
The visuospatial sket...
... middle of paper ...
...ing memory capacity and consequently also with possible attentional problems and learning disabilities.
However, before such trainings might help children with low working memory capacity, it is necessary that especially teachers attentively try to identify them. For this, teachers need to be educated in the characteristics of these children and simultaneously need to know where affected children and their parents can go for more information. As the final step, parents, teachers and children preferably weight together the pro and cons of each approach and finally decide whether to try several strategy trainings or specific training programs, as the CMWT. However, considering that it is not a standard yet to inform teachers and parents for the occurrence and consequences of low working memory capacity, it still seems a long way this scenario becoming more realistic.
Cloran (n.d.) suggest teachers need to have a broad understanding of giftedness and learning disabilities, a variety of identification measures and the ability to modify the curriculum and implement differentiated teaching strategies to meet the unique needs of all students. A graduate teacher recognises that students learn in their own way and should understand and be able to identify a number of teaching strategies to differentiate and meet the learning needs of all students. They may create groups based on previous assessment results and set clear or modified instructions for each group based on ability or learning styles. To address the specific learning needs of all student abilities, multi-sensory strategies using charts, diagrams, outside lessons and videos, as well as posters around the room or information on the desk could be used. Tomlinson (1999) suggests that differentiated instruction aims to build on student’s strengths and maximize their learning by adjusting instructional tasks to suit their individual needs. Ensuring teaching and instructions are clear, revising and prompting students during lessons and providing templates and assisting student in breaking down tasks into achievable, systematic chunks are some additional examples. Lucas, (2008) suggests highlighting key vocabulary within the text to focus students on the central concepts within the text. Quick finishing students should be provided with the opportunity to extend themselves with extension tasks that have a specific purpose and
Willcutt, E. G., Betjemann, R. S., Pennington, B. F., Olson, R. K., Defries, J. C., & Wadsworth, S. J. (2009). Longitudinal Study of Reading Disability and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Implications for Education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 181-192.
Even if a parent reads to his or her child often, the child’s cognitive development is likely to be affected by his or her teacher. If the teacher does not succeed in inspiring the child, then it is likely that the rate of cognitive development will be lower than a child with a successfully inspiring teacher, regardless of parent to child reading rate.
Preschoolers can’t concentrate on an activity for a long time. They can't remain attentive for more than three or four minutes on a particular matter. Teaches should plan methods, through which, they can increase this time span in a periodic way rather than attempting for a sudden increase.
His theory changed how people viewed children’s behaviors and inspired other researchers to study this field, which has increased people’s understanding of cognitive development in childhood and adolescence. More importantly, people have learned how to understand and communicate with children and adolescences based on his ideas, which greatly helps the development of education. Teachers should lead children to pay attention to the process of learning rather than the results. Children and adolescences should also be encouraged to work in individual as well as in groups. Evaluating the level of student’s cognition is also important in order to assign suitable
Part 2 tells the story of a boy with executive functioning deficits and his parents to highlight common experiences in families stressed by this problem and explain what’s happening in children’s minds. Finally, the column addresses how best to help support children with these issues and offers tips for parents.
As Grabe points out, a student’s working memory is critical in language acquisition and literacy. Educators must be careful not to overload this working memory while at the same time creating educational opportunities that make salient the important processes needed in increase fluency. A constant delicate balance, educators must also address the associative component of Adaptive Control of Thought Rational (ACT-R) by giving their students repeated and extensive exposure to print while at the same time employing scaffolding and chunking methods, again not to overload the working
In the classroom, there is a wide range of learners because every student has unique qualities and needs. Some students are able to quickly master any problem given to them, while other students seem to struggle with basic or grade level problems. When students struggle, they have a tendency to give up or exhibit behavioral problems. Why do some students struggle while others learn with ease? What strategies are available to help struggling students? The resolution to these questions is found in the study of cognitive development.
No matter the severity of this disability, these students all have intellectual functioning needs in the area of memory, generalization, and motivation. The second defined feature of intellectual disability limits the child’s developmental life skills such as conceptual skills (reading, numbers, money, time, and communication), social skills (understanding following social rules, obeying laws, detecting motivation of others), and practical skills (feeding, bathing, dressing, occupational, and navigation skills) (Reynolds, Zupanick & Dombeck).
"Special Education." - Teaching Students with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Resource Guide for Teachers. Province of British Columbia, 23 Aug. 2006. Web. 09 Apr. 2016. .
Manassis, K., Tannock, R., Garland, E. J., Minde, K., McInnes, A., & Clark, S. (2007) replicated a previous study using a small sample. Manassis, et al. expanded the participant's sample number. The goal of the study was to determine if the intervention of oral language, clinical social impairment, and working memory would be helpful
the fact that children’s cognitive capacity is expanded by a significant and clear-cut change in
They also aimed dissociate these cognitive processes based on their understanding to the investigational operation of working memory load which is displayed in study one and then they focused on age related changes in study
The class in which the observations took place was a Year One and Two class with twenty six pupils in the class. Adults within the class were the Teacher, one Teaching Assistant with the occasional help of a Special Needs Assistant. Confidentiality is important within the classroom setting therefore to respect the individuals own confidentiality they will be known as Child J throughout this assignment. Child J is a male aged five years and three months. It was decided that the observations of the individual would be about concentration, as the Teacher was concerned that J does not have the ability to concentrate for more than five minutes at a time. The observations will be noted and taken further if it is felt that it will be beneficial to the child’s education.
Mastery learning theorists and practitioners clearly (and forcefully) assert that a mastery approach is useful for any subject and for higher order thinking skills. Any project that uses mastery learning only in the service of a few subjects or in simple recall areas is doing it a disservice. What Benjamin Bloom has said is that many teachers and programs in this country tend to focus only on the first and second levels of cognitive thinking. Thus, in some instances, mastery learning in special needs activities could be open to this same criticism.