How To Write A Rhetorical Analysis Of Churchill's Speech

624 Words2 Pages

When Churchill gave this speech in the 1940’s, he was trying to spark a flame in the hearts of the people. By this, I mean he was trying to pump them up! He wanted to appeal to them as a smart individual, with well thought out ideas. Obviously the reason he wanted to be portrayed as a “smart individual” was because no one would want to listen to some dunce trying to talk them into joining the war! They only would do so if they had a reason of why. So he set out in this speech to make this appealing. Churchill started off by saying “I speak to you for the first time as prime minister”. Sounds like a guy who is powerful and has authority, but yet I feel as I am equal to him… Exactly! Churchill was using ethos here, trying to convey a sense of moral into the people. He shows that he is a figure to be looked up to, but yet also he can just be “some other dude”. But just because he has authority and is relatable, doesn’t necessarily mean he has good ideas. He had to use reasoning and also evidence to support him. …show more content…

He wants the people to see that his is a patriot. And he does so through the use of Pathos. He wants to appeal emotionally to the people. He says that he is doing all of this “For the life of our country, of our empire, of our allies, and above all the cast of freedom”. Hmm that’s a lot of “ours”. He uses repetition here to show that this is not only going to benefit him, but everyone. And he wants to prove that. Now the Pathos here is that he is trying to relate to the people, by showing he also cares about the country. But, just a kind hearted man, with ideas, and authority isn’t always enough. He needs supporting

Open Document