Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical appreciation of sonnet no.130
Sonnet 130 analysis
Summary of sonnet 130
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical appreciation of sonnet no.130
Hale, James. "Sonnet 130." Master plots II: Poetry, Revised Edition (2002): 1-3. Literary Reference Center. Web. 9 Mar. 2015. Summary The author talked about the poem, forms and devices, and themes and meanings. The author talks about the poem as a whole when he breaks down each line for better understanding. Furthermore he explains what the poet is saying so that it seems less offensive than what is shown. The second main idea the author use is forms and devices he uses line from the poem to tell how the poet felt his mistress was still beautiful even though she didn’t have traditional standards of beauty. Also the author tells how the poet feels the woman would be so caught up in her appearance that she wouldn’t see the beauty her beloved one sees. “Sonnet 130 provides logic instead of metaphor, objectivity instead of hyperbole” is what the author believed (Hale 3). Evaluation …show more content…
But also what the author was saying about the poem is accurate as well because he was saying that the poet loved his mistress for what was on the inside as well as the outside and that’s the kind of love that is needed. Also when the author talked about the views on whether the girl’s hair was beautiful regardless if it was black since the belief is that gold hair is pretty and since her hair is black it’s ugly. Also the author says that women in society are the same that they would be so focused on altering the appearance that they wouldn’t realize their beloved loved them regardless. Lastly, he says that the poet broke the standards of beauty since no normal human being could meet them. Even though he had good intentions for his mistress the ways he went about them could have been
...e speaker admits she is worried and confused when she says, “The sonnet is the story of a woman’s struggle to make choices regarding love.” (14) Her mind is disturbed from the trials of love.
I found Donne’s “Holy Sonnet 10” and “Holy Sonnet 14” to be similar in style, but different in context. Obviously, it is logical that they are similar in style because they are written by the same author.
In sonnet 66, Shakespeare creates a paradoxical difficulty for himself as a poet. As Helen Vendler points out, the censorship described in line 9 necessitates an absence of art from the poem (309-10), yet coevally Shakespeare must keep the reader interested. He straddles this problem by speeding the tempo, creating questions in the reader’s mind, and representing intense emotions-- all through apparently artless techniques.
Can you imagine being forced to hide your true self, identity, feelings, and desires from the world in fear that you might be executed? That is exactly how Shakespeare had to live in his time period. Sonnet 135 by William Shakespeare is a coded poem that secretly expresses the author’s homosexual attraction. He uses homoerotic depictions, transgressive sexuality, and gay signs to secretly express is homosexual emotions in a seemingly heterosexual poem. It is clarified in earlier sonnets that this poem is addressing Henry Wriothesley, who loves The Dark Lady.
“My Mistress’s Eyes Are Nothing Like the Sun” by William Shakespeare, is a sonnet with an interesting twist on love. He writes, “My Mistress’s eyes are nothing like the sun/ Coral is far more red than her lip’s red” (2-3). He finishes the poems with these two lines, “And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare/ As any she belied with false compare” (13-14). Shakespeare is implying that his lover does not fit the hyperboles’ that other poets of his time wrote about, when they spoke of their lovers. When you are truly in love looks aren’t important, because your heart doesn’t judge by appearance. Looks might initially attract you to someone, but who they are as a person is what makes you fall in love. What one person thinks is beautiful and perfect the next person might find unattractive. Shakespeare wanted to remind his love that to him she is perfect. Even though Shakespeare is remembered for the poems he wrote he left a verse on her life with this
That means, the approaches of poet’s love remain the same. In one place, he portrays beauty as conveying a great responsibility in the sonnets addressed to the young man. The poet has experienced what he thinks of as "the marriage of true minds," also known as true love, that his love remains strong, and that he believes that it’s eternal. Nothing will stop their love, as in the symbols like all the ships, stars and stormy seas that fill the landscape of the poem and so on what can affect to their love. The poet is too much attracted with the young man’s beauty, though this indicates to something really bad behavior. But in another place, Shakespeare makes fun of the dark lady in sonnet 130. He explains that his lover, the dark lady, has wires for hair, bad breath, dull cleavage, a heavy step, pale lips and so on, but to him, real love is, the sonnet implies, begins when we accept our lovers for what they are as well as what they are not. But other critics may not agree with this and to them, beauty may define to something
Sonnet 130 openly mocks the traditional love sonnets of the time. This is, perhaps, made most apparent through the use of subversive comparisons and exaggerated similes. The intention of a subversive comparison is to mimic a traditional comparison yet highlight the opposite purpose. Whereas his contemporaries would compare their love’s beauty to alabaster or pearls, Shakespeare notes, “If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun” (3), therefore intentionally downplaying the beauty of his mistress. Later he states, “...in some perfumes there is more delight / than in the breath that from my mistress reeks” (7-8). Both of these exemplify that Shakespeare ridicules the traditional love sonnet by employing the same imagery to convey opposite intentions.
Shakespeare’s sonnet 130 is a sonnet much different than the normal love sonnets of that time. A well-known re-occurring them in Shakespeare’s sonnets is love. Shakespeare’s sonnet 130 can be interpreted many different ways. Sonnet 130 describes what love is to Shakespeare by making the poem a joke in order to mock other poets. In sonnet 130, Shakespeare spoke of a courtly love. Shakespeare goes against the usual style of courtly love writing in this sonnet. “In comparison to Petrarch’s Sonnet 90 and Shakespeare’s own Sonnets 18 and 20, Sonnet 130 is a parody of courtly love, favoring a pastoral love that is austere in its declaration, yet deep-rooted in sincerity” (Dr. Tilla Slabbert 1). Sonnet 130 mocks the men who use the traditional
Shakespeare and Petrarch, two poets popular for their contributions on the issue of love, both tackle the subject of their work through sonnet, yet there are key contrasts in their style, structure, and in the way, each approaches their subjects. Moreover, it is clear that in "Sonnet 130," Shakespeare in fact parodies Petrarch's style and thoughts as his storyteller describes his mistress, whose "eyes are in no way as the sun" (Shakespeare 1918). Shakespeare seems, by all accounts, to mock the exaggerated descriptions expanded throughout Petrarch’s piece by giving an English poem portraying the speaker’s love in terms that are characteristic of a flawed woman not a goddess. On the other hand, Petrarch's work is full of symbolism. In reviewing "Sonnet 292" from the Canzoniere, through “Introduction to Literature and Arts,” Petrarch’s utilization of resemblance and the romanticizing of Petrarch's female subject are normal for the Petrarchan work. The leading major contrast between the two poems is the piece structure utilized (McLaughlin).
The speaker uses metaphors to describe his mistress’ eyes to being like the sun; her lips being red as coral; cheeks like roses; breast white as snow; and her voices sounding like music. In the first few lines of the sonnet, the speaker view and tells of his mistress as being ugly, as if he was not attracted to her. He give...
to let go of these imperfections and replace the defects with love Sonnet 130 is a unique love
Both Sonnets have different styles. Sonnet 18 is a much more traditional poem, showing the reader a picture of his muse in the most divine way. Shakespeare uses a complex metaphor of comparing his subject to the summer, but at the same time making it easy to understand. The poet goes as traditional as possible; his friend surpasses the beauty of summer, as summer will fade and turn to winter. Sonnet 130 is just as easy to understand as the former. The use of straightforward comparisons that go from line to line, instead of one metaphor elaborated through the entire poem, makes this sonnet quite different in style. Sonnet 130, in contradiction to Sonnet 18, purposefully branches off from the traditional romantic love poem for he does not describe the subject as a true beauty but as his true love.
...es they create different images, which compare humans to nature. Also, both sonnets create the idea of a courtly love sonnet, but Sonnet 18 has a better explanation or image of that. The speaker’s beloved is way too perfect and cannot be compared to anything, even though it could be the most beautiful day of the year, it still would not give justice to his lovers beauty. In Sonnet 130 it still talks about love, but the speaker is being sarcastic and makes fun of the usual love poem. Regardless, the first part of the Sonnet 130 speaks about his mistress’s unattractiveness; the ending explains that despite her imperfectness, the speaker loves her for who is she is. Although it seems to be difficult to figure out whether the speaker or Shakespeare wants his beloved to be perfect or imperfect, it does reflect that Shakespeare does appreciate beauty, flaws, and nature.
This poem speaks of a love that is truer than denoting a woman's physical perfection or her "angelic voice." As those traits are all ones that will fade with time, Shakespeare exclaims his true love by revealing her personality traits that caused his love. Shakespeare suggests that the eyes of the woman he loves are not twinkling like the sun: "My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun" (1). Her hair is compared to a wire: "If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head" (3). These negative comparisons may sound almost unloving, however, Shakespeare proves that the mistress outdistances any goddess. This shows that the poet appreciates her human beauties unlike a Petrarchan sonnet that stresses a woman's cheek as red a rose or her face white as snow. Straying away from the dazzling rhetoric, this Shakespearean poem projects a humane and friendly impression and elicits laughter while expressing a truer love. A Petrarchan sonnet states that love must never change; this poem offers a more genuine expression of love by describing a natural woman.
You can finish that sentence in your head can’t you? Whether you are a strong poetry enthusiast or not, you still probably know this famous poem. Sonnet 18 by William Shakespeare is one of the most well-known poems of all time. Time and time again this piece of art has influenced contemporary pieces. Some examples of this would be; the song “Sonnet 18” by Pink Floyd, a novel titled The Darling Buds of May by H E Bates, and a famous essay “Rough Winds Do Shake” written by Maeve Landman. Now this doesn’t not include the endless, countless list of times when Sonnet 18 has been quoted throughout history, especially in today’s media such as Star Trek, Doctor Who, and many others. It is doubtless to say that Sonnet 18 by william shakespeare is one of the most famous and well-known poems, and for good reason. This poem truly is a beautiful piece of work. William Shakespeare utilizes many things to help enhance the reading experience. Sonnet 18 by William Shakespeare draws the reader in through the use of several poetic techniques including rhyme and rhythm, personification, and metaphor.