How Is Madame Defarge Justified

591 Words2 Pages

Madame Defarge is one of the most infamous characters in all of classical literature as her role of the agitator towards the Manettes. Madame Defarge was known for her ruthless actions towards the aristocracy and anyone who stood in the ways of her punishing the upper classes. Despite her violent actions, Madame Defarge was justified in her anger towards the upper classes as her family was blatantly mistreated by them and the mistreatment of peasants at the hands of the aristocracy had become a typical factor in everyday society.
Madame Defarge has been seen as a ruthless tyrant through all of A Tale of Two Cities until in chapter sixteen she reveals that ‘ [she] was brought up among fishermen of the sea-shore, and that peasant family so injured by the two Evrémonde brothers, as the Bastille paper describes, is [her] family’(Dickens 339). This completely changes the motives of Madame Defarge as instead of being a pointlessly violent character, she is given a new depth. Her family suffered at the hands of the Evrémondes and the aristocracy and she is determined to get karmic retribution for her family and in a way, all peasants of …show more content…

She thought the only way she could get revenge would be if every party involved in her family’s suffering was punished and this is demonstrated when Madame Defarge says that ‘[she] care[s] nothing for this Doctor. He may wear his head or lose it, for any interest [she has] in him; it is all one to [her]. But, the Evrémonde people are to be exterminated, and the wife and child must follow the husband and father’(Dickens 356). If Defarge does not succeed in harming every last member of the Evrémonde family, she will feel like she has failed avenging her family’s legacy. The riches and happiness of this family are not deserved in the eyes of Defarge as peasant blood was spilled as a costly

Open Document