How Is Churchill Presented In The Darkest Hour

1007 Words3 Pages

In the midst of World War 2, Britain was facing hard times. They lacked guidance and a stable government. In the film “The Darkest Hour”, Britain is portrayed as being an absolute nightmare. With the Nazi regime approaching quickly, and having a prime minister that everyone wanted out, change had to be made. While the film accurately depicts a lot of the scenes from this period, there are a few scenes that are skewed or misrepresented. Although it is true that Neville Chamberlain was voted out and forced out of office, and Winston Churchill took control after him, how this happened is misrepresented. Chamberlain’s relationship with Churchill is altered as well. The most important aspect that was left out of the film was how much dialogue was actually going on between …show more content…

In the film Chamberlain, Lord Halifax and a few others had a brief meeting and came to the conclusion that Churchill was the only choice. This decision is extremely ironic considering Lord Halifax was initially offered the position but turned it down. He becomes one of Churchill’s biggest haters. As stated in “Cometh the Finest Hour,” A meeting took place that would change how Britain operated. The four people at this meeting were Chamberlain, Lord Halifax, Churchill, and David Margesson (Downing). During this meeting, they discussed who would ultimately become the next Prime Minister (Murray). The film portrayed this event as the only option with a short meeting in which Churchill was not present. In the movie, he awaited the news by a mail runner as he was smoking a cigar and lying on his bed. The film depicts Churchill’s character as having no prior office experience and no leadership capabilities what-so-ever. How Churchill actually got into office is very different than what the movie portrays. The film implies that Churchill “lucked” into the position, when in reality he was elected fairly in the meeting that took

Open Document