More handpicked essays just for you.
Examples of character analysis, 123 essays
Examples of character analysis, 123 essays
Examples of character analysis, 123 essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Justice Wargrave uses his judgements of the guests to devise an order in which he will murder his victims. His criteria for the murders are the severity of the crime, the criminal’s level of responsibility for the crime, and the level of guilt that the criminal feels about their wrongdoing. Wargrave plans his murders to align with who he believes deserves to suffer the most. This is evident in the murders of Mrs. Rogers, Emily Brent, and Vera Claythorne. Wargrave murders Mrs. Rogers early in the novel because he believes that she should not suffer as much as the others. She already suffers from enough guilt over her crime that Wargrave thinks she should not suffer from fear of death on the island. When the guests arrive at the house, Vera’s …show more content…
When the gramophone announces the list of murders, “Emily Brent sat upright, her head held high” (Christie 49), because she feels no remorse over the girl’s death. In Brent’s defense, she states, “The abandoned creature, not content with having one sin on her conscious, committed a still graver sin. She took her own life” (Christie 111). Although Brent did not directly tell Beatrice to kill herself, she drove the girl to it, despite her belief that “her own action-her own sin-that was what drove her to it” (Christie 111). As the novel progresses, Brent begins to express her guilt internally. She has dreams and hallucinations that Beatrice Taylor is with her, and right before her death, Brent states, “There was somebody in the room… somebody all wet and dripping… Beatrice Taylor came from the river” (Christie 199). Wargrave chooses this moment to kill Emily Brent because she is beginning to suffer from the guilt of her …show more content…
It is her fault that Cyril died and she feels very guilty about it, despite not expressing her guilt to the other characters. On the outside, Vera looks innocent, and Lombard states, “I don’t fancy there’s anything insane about you, Vera. You strike me as being one of the sanest and most levelheaded girls I’ve come across” (Christie 168). Internally, however, Vera expresses her guilt through dreams and hallucinations. In the beginning of the novel, Christie writes, “A picture rose clearly in her mind. Cyril’s head, bobbing up and down, swimming to the rock… and herself, swimming in easy practised strokes after him… but knowing, only too surely, that she wouldn’t be in time” (Christie 5). Wargrave believes that she is at fault even more because she lets Cyril die out of greed and lust. Vera thinks to herself, “Horrid whiney spoilt little brat! If it weren’t for him, Hugo would be rich… able to marry the girl he loved” (Christie 217). Wargrave leaves her to be the last victim, not only because she is the most guilt, but because he knows that guilt will lead her to suicide. For Wargrave, it was “an interesting psychological experiment. Would the conscious of her own guilt… be sufficient… to cause her to take her own life?” (Christie 298). In the end, she fulfills his expectations and kills herself like the poem
Guilt is one of the most powerful forces known to man. It can drive the average man into a paranoia struck fool, ravenous for stability. Guilt can cause people to cave in from under them, revealing an empty and hollow shell. As children, we are conditioned to feel guilty when we do something wrong. As we get older, we learn that we receive praise and acceptance when we behave properly, or as is expected of us. Because humans have a strong desire to be loved and accepted, we do things in order to receive approval. Vera Claythorne was one of the characters mostly affected by guilt. She would constantly get hysteria attacks because of the guilt she carried. She often imagined Hugo was near. General Macarthur had very strong guilt as well, so
Lizzie Borden is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of slaughtering her father and stepmother in cold blood.
Several points throughout the story indicate foreshadowing of the ending. The first main point was the rotten odor coming from Emily’s house. Several of her neighbors complained to the Board of Aldermen concerning the foul stench that hails from the old lady’s household. This point helps readers contemplate and theorize what the smell that the neighbors were talking about. The second main point that indicated foreshadowing was the event that occurred after Emily’s father passes away. The readers are told that she became very isolated in her home and became distant from the world outside. The narrator also recounts that it took three whole days and several people to persuade her to let them help her “dispose of the body” (1000). This was a big indicator of what was going to happen because this was what she essentially did: kept a body dead body in her home. The third main point was when Emily successfully bought poison or arsenic from the local pharmacy. This event showed many clues of the ending. When she was buying the arsenic, she did not explain to the druggist her intention of buying and using the poison. This interaction between the two raises some eyebrows for it was truly mysterious for an old lady to purchase poison randomly. The final main point is the story of Homer Barron’s mysterious disappearance. Before he eventually
Arthur Dimmesdale is a fictional character written by Nathaniel Hawthorne in the 1850’s from the book, “The Scarlet Letter.” Arthur Dimmesdale went through great lengths of guilt and suffering throughout the book. He is a Puritan minister who had a child named Pearl, whose mother was Hester Prynne. They hide their relationship together in the years of Pearl growing up. Arthur Dimmesdale was the only Puritan out of four main characters in The Scarlet Letter. Dimmesdale knows that he has sinned in the very beginning of the novel, but kept all his feelings inside, letting the guilt overwhelm him until the end. When he committed adultery, he knew that what he did was wrong, but at the time he had only put
Have a motive- All of the people Wargrave chose to bring on the island were murderers that had not been found guilty in court.
Emily was not what you would call the average murderer. She was strange however, after her own death (which is known to reader in the very first line of the story) the townspeople described her as '…a tradition, a duty, and a care; a sort of hereditary obligation upon the town';(73). When her father died she would not let them take the body for three days, now that's pretty strange. The people in town at the time didn't think she was crazy, they explained her actions like this, 'We remembered all the young men her father had driven away, and we knew that with nothing left, she would have to cling to that which had robbed her, as people will.'; (75) Here is the first indicator that her motives for killing her only love Homer Baron are founded on an emotional type of basis. Her father believed that no one was ever good enough for his daughter, and because she never got close to anyone she didn't know how to let go either, she never experienced that kind of love you get when you meet ...
Guilty or not guilty? This the key question during the murder trial of a young man accused of fatally stabbing his father. The play 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, introduces to the audience twelve members of a jury made up of contrasting men from various backgrounds. One of the most critical elements of the play is how the personalities and experiences of these men influence their initial majority vote of guilty. Three of the most influential members include juror #3, juror #10, and juror #11. Their past experiences and personal bias determine their thoughts and opinions on the case. Therefore, how a person feels inside is reflected in his/her thoughts, opinions, and behavior.
In her final letter to her mother, Eliza admits her wrong doings. She tells her mother she ignored all the things she was told. All their advice fell on her deaf ears. She explains that she had fallen victim to her own indiscretion. She had become the latest conquest of “a designing libertine,” (Foster 894). She knew about Sanford’s reputation, she knew his intentions, and she knew that he was married, yet she still started a relationship with him. And her blatant disregard for facts and common sense caused her unwed pregnancy and premature demise. Eliza Wharton had nobody to blame for her situation but herself. She ignored warnings, advice, common sense, and other options available to her. She chose her ill fated path and had to suffer the consequences.
Your honor, we the jury are here today to give our decision on the punishment in the case before the court titled the state of Texas v. James Broadnax. Your honor, as you and everyone in the court room here today recalls, the defendant was charged of murdering two people in their mid-to-late twenties. For the record purposes sir, let the record show the two victims go by the names of Mr. Stephen Swan and Mr. Matthew Butler. Let the record also further indicate the defendant goes by the name of Mr. James Broadmax.
takes no responsibility for her actions. Daisy even goes back to Tom, who cheated on her and
Her necrophilia is realized first when she refused the death of her father as she desperately clings to the father figure who disciplined her into loneliness. It was the only form of love she knew. It is once realized when Homer dies, however, this time it is with her hands that death has come upon it. She almost actually controlled it. She denied the changes, the possibilities of Homer leaving her, of refusing to marry her, by cutting his timeline—preserving him in death, effectively. Emily and Homer’s weird cohabitation divulges Emily’s upsetting effort to marry life and death. However, death ultimately triumphs.
After a traumatic, horrible event takes place, there are often further issues as to who will take the blame for it or who will sacrifice themselves for the blame. After an automobile hits and kills Myrtle Wilson in The Great Gatsby, her husband George is ravenous in his attempts to find her murderer. Although it is clear that Daisy Buchanan drove the car that killed Myrtle, George shoots Gatsby due to the fact that Tom Buchanan leads him into thinking Gatsby is the driver. When Nick Carraway confronts Tom about this, Tom nonchalantly replies, “I told [George] the truth,” (Fitzgerald, 2000) indicating full well that he knew George would get rid of Gatsby. Instead of taking responsibility for the calamity and saving Gatsby (whom Daisy supposedly “loves”), Tom and Daisy act out of self-interest and “retreat back into their money… and let other people clean up the mess they had made…” (Fitzgerald, 2000.) On the o...
Their choices led to the death of Myrtle, Gatsby and Wilson. Myrtle wouldn 't have died if Tom didn 't cheat on Daisy. Tom 's choice to stray from his wife caused Myrtle to run out into the road because she thought Jordan was Tom 's wife so she ran to stop the car. The car was actually being driven by Daisy who was accompanied by Gatsby. This accident also put Daisy at fault because if she hadn’t of cheated as well, her and Tom never would have had the argument about her love for Gatsby. This would have prevented the accident altogether. Tom was also at fault for telling Wilson who the owner of the car was which was Gatsby. Although Gatsby wasn 't the one driving, he ended up with the blame for it. Wilson wasn 't in the right mindset and went to Gatsby 's house and shot him. Gatsby was found floating in the pool on an air mattress looking up at the sky. Wilson was found not too far away on the grass. All of these deaths were a result of Tom and Daisy not thinking through the choices they made, knowing that they had their money to fall back on if anything were to ever go
It is this selfishness that makes it hard for the reader to be empathetic towards her later in the play, as it is evident in this scene that her hardships were brought on by herself. If she hadn’t insisted on the murder, she would not be driven insane by guilt, which would eventually lead to her death.... ... middle of paper ... ... As we saw, it was plaguing her dreams, and taking a heavy toll on her mental health.
Vera felt as though it was only right to follow the poem. Every time somebody died or disappeared a little china figure would break or disappear but at the end Vera toke the last one standing with her as a token saying that they made it to the end. While she was hanging herself the little figure broke, “The little china figure fell from her hand. It rolled unneeded and broke against the fender” (Christie 268). She also thought that’s what Hugo wanted her to because she was responsible for his nephew death.