Cyclic Dissatisfaction: A Study of 'The Man Who Wasn’t There' and 'Scarlet Street'

1276 Words3 Pages

There is truth in the phrase “hurting people hurt people.” A cycle of causing pain and receiving it is one that can only be broken by rising above the desire for revenge and living your life to the fullest. In the films THE MAN WHO WASN’T THERE (2001) and SCARLET STREET (Fritz Lang, 1945) we see a cycle of a different kind: dissatisfaction leads to more dissatisfactions. In THE MAN WHO WASN’T THERE, the audience is given the sense that perhaps the series of events that lead tho the main character’s was no fault of his own, however, knowing that the Coen’s influence was SCARLET STREET, one might argue that the main character in THE MAN WHO WASN’T THERE was in full control of the situation. Both films had deceptively mild characters who’s actions seemed completely abnormal for a simple man. THE MAN WHO WASN’T THERE is about Ed Crane, a simple barber who decides to break out of his boring cycle of life by becoming a dry cleaner. This decision leads to a series of events that cause Ed to lose not only himself, but everyone around him. In SCARLET STREET, Christopher Cross is a dull cashier and part-time painter who falls in love with a slothful woman who uses his affections for her own gain. Once again, a single decision …show more content…

In SCARLET STREET, Johnny is accused of a stabbing that Christopher Cross committed while Ed’s wife in THE MAN WHO WASN’T THERE is accused for a stabbing in place of her husband. Although placed at various points of the film, the parallels show that audience that sometimes the wrong people die and that the protagonist is not always innocent. There are several smaller parallels that could be named, such as the theme of drunk mistakes, tempers leading to downfall and car crashes, but it all would lead the conclusion that the Coens are vert studious filmmakers who enjoy inserting the things that shaped their own careers into their artistic

Open Document