Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Monsters in literature essay
Examples of good vs evil in ebowulf
Examples of good vs evil in ebowulf
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Definition of Evil
Throughout history, there have been many meanings of the word "evil," which originated in the Germanic language. According to Google.com, the word evil can be used as a noun and be defined as the wicked or immoral part of someone or something. It can also be used as an adjective and be characterized by misfortune of suffering. Words such as "wicked", "immoral", and "sinful" can also be used interchangeably with the word evil, while words like "virtuous", "beneficial", and "pleasant" are antonyms of the word evil. For the purposes of argument, I will use the definition evil to mean the force in nature that governs and gives rise to wickedness and sin. Traits of evil can be exemplified in both the epic poem Beowulf and
…show more content…
The monster, Grendel, demonstrates a perfect example evil when he killed many of the Danes in their own mead hall. The scops say that Grendel:
Snatched up thirty men, smashed them
Unknowingly in their beds and ran out
With their bodies, the blood dripping behind him, back
To his lair, delighted with his night's slaughter (37-40).
In this passage, we can see that the evil deeds take place at the loss of another person's happiness. Grendel was only pleased after he had taken the lives of many men. The Danes "lived happy [lives] in this hall"(15) before Grendel attached and murdered the warriors. This is simply one example of how evil is always trying to overcome the happy, optimistic ways in which people live their daily lives. The second time Grendel attacked the Mead hall, he also exemplified the force of evil that caused pain and suffering to the Danes. The scops say:
Grendel came again, so set
On Murder that no crime could ever be enough,
No savage assault quench his lust
For evil
…show more content…
This short story told from the point of view of a man named Montresor, who decides to seek revenge on Fortunato, a man who had in some way insulted Montresor. To get Fortunato to trust Montresor, the latter uses cunning qualities that are characteristics of evil. He exemplifies these qualities when he says: it must be understood, that neither by word nor deed had I given Fortunato cause to doubt my good will. I continued, as was my want to smile in his face, and he did not perceive that my smile now was at the thought of his immolation (432; par.
Montresor, fifty years after it happened, is confessing to the murder of his foe, Fortunato. He justifies his actions by saying that Fortunato caused him a thous...
Montresor is a man who feels pride in himself and in his family, so when Fortunato—an acquaintance of Montresor— “venture[s] upon insult,” Montresor “vow[s] revenge” against him (1). Montresor hastily decides that he must kill Fortunato, even though his use of the word “venture” implies that Fortunato had not yet insulted him, but nearly did. Montresor’s impulsive need for revenge causes him to formulate a plan to murder his acquaintance. He keeps Fortunato intoxicated by “presenting him…[with] wine,” he “fetter[s] him to the granite,” and he “plaster[s] up… [a wall of] new masonry” to trap Fortunato in the catacombs (39, 71, 89). All of these acts are signs that the need for revenge has made Fortunato insane. A person who has any sense of morals would not commit crimes such as Montresor’s. His impetuous decision to exact revenge caused him to lose his
One catches a glimpse of Montresor’s lost happiness from his obscure past, moreover his distressed self-esteem, in this statement. His façade begins to slip. The strain starts to show. At last Montresor leads Fortunato to the remote niche and secures him to the wall. Surprised Fortunato does not immediately respond.
On the other hand, it is obvious that "evil" Grendel could not survive without the "good" humans.
In times before printed books were common, stories and poems were passed from generation to generation by word of mouth. From such oral traditions come great epics such as England’s heroic epic, Beowulf. In Beowulf, the monster Grendel serves as the evil character acting against the poem’s hero, as shown by his unnatural strength, beast-like qualities, and alienation from society.
As children, we were taught that good and evil were black and white terms. The fairy tales that our parents would read to us have conditioned us to believe that characters such as the princess in distress or the prince in shining armour were nothing but friendly and good, while the troll guarding his own bridge or the fire-breathing dragon were the most frighteningly evil creatures of all. However, as we grew up, we learned that these distinctions are never so easily black and white, but more-so different shades of grey. We learned that the characters that we initially deemed evil had reasons for acting that way, and most of them out of their control. Such is the case with the main character in John Gardner’s Grendel. The character Grendel
Vengeance and pride are fundamentally important to this short story. From the inception of the tale it is clear that the narrator is a proud, vindictive man; opening with, “the thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge,” the narrator immediately alerts the reader to the dark aspects of his own character. Because “insult” and not “the thousand injuries” caused the narrator to “vow” revenge, the reader can infer Montresor is prideful because, although he already had conflict with Fortunato, insult was what made the tense situation unbearable for Montresor––so much so that he vowed to take action. Use of the word “vow” is significant because it indicates that the grievance was meaningful in the mind of Montresor, allowing for the reader to more easily identify with the actions to be revealed throughout the course of the story; if the reader believes that Montresor was provoked in a profound way, ...
Grendel is the embodiment of all that is evil and dark. Grendel by John Gardner retells the Anglo-Saxon epic poem Beowulf from the perspective of the antagonist, Grendel. He is the outcast of society; doomed to roam in the shadows of Hrothgar’s city, Heorot. He is an outside threat to society and all that is good. His whole existence is to hate good simply because it is good. Mankind can only be truly free if good and evil coexist in the world; and all people are born with an evil and dark side.
In any classic story about heroes and villains, the monsters involved are often characterized as the evil ones and, consequently, receive no justice under the law. Throughout the epic story Beowulf, the hero of the story encounters three monsters that are threats to society: Grendel, Grendel’s mother, and the dragon. The monsters in Beowulf are quickly targeted and destroyed because of the harm they cause to society. However, upon further examination of the monsters and the motives for their actions, the reader can view the monsters not as the cutthroat villains they may initially appear to be, but perhaps as victims of society. In today’s society, murderers and robbers are also portrayed as “monsters” because of the atrocious crimes
Out of the nearly seven billion people living in the world, not one can truly be classified as purely good or evil. Rather, people are a combination of both good and evil. The understanding of what it means to be good or evil is often flawed in today’s society. Good can best be defined as the ability to put others before one’s self. On the contrary, evil is a trait that is defined as having no mercy and lacking the ability to see another person's perspective. In Grendel, written by John Gardner, the main character named Grendel has been in battle for twelve years with King Hrothgar and his mead hall. Grendel can best be described in the novel as a sort of monster who has a tendency to become quite violent toward humans. Despite Grendel’s violence,
Since the beginning of time, fairy tales, stories and legends have shared a common theme where good and evil are played against each other. In the story of “Beowulf”, translated by, “Burton Raffel”, there is a hero who plays as a good character, and there is also a demon who rules the dark side. The hero Beowulf, agrees to take a journey to conquer the evil monster Grendel. But when Beowulf is trying to defeat the beast, Grendel fights back, causing integrity and generosity to vanish. The common theme in various tales like in Beowulf is, good vs. evil.
The famous author, Ruth Manning Gordon once wrote, “It [evil] is a grim business, in which we are fighting not a fellow human being, but a deadly force” (67).Gordon describes evil as concocting a product of destruction. This is similar to the maliciousness that causes extermination in Beowulf and The Pardoner’sTale. An example of this destruction is illustrated in Beowulf when the author wrote, “… smashed them unknowing in their beds and ran out with their bodies, the blood dripping behind him[Grendel] , back to his lair delighted with his night’s slaughter” (37-40). The monstrous behavior exhibited by Grendel proved deadly to others and cost the innocent the precious treasure of life. Similarly, The Pardoner’s Tale also demonstrates a deathly outcome through savage decisions. For example, Chaucer states, “Thus these two murderers received their due, so did the treacherous young poisoner too” (294- 295). Evil in the end of the course of the tale has lead to the tragic downfall of three men, and the impulsive decision motivated by avarice has been executed in
Carefully, cautiously the Montresor plotted precisely how he would exact revenge upon Fortunato. Much time and great energy was devoted to this plan, selecting a time that would be best: during carnival when the town would be celebratory, his servants apt to run off and join the celebration, when the two could silently disappear without notice or question. No detail is forgotten; he allows for no deterrents. He follows through with such a confidence that never does he stumble or hesitate in carrying out his plan. The Montresor indicates that he had never given. To continue with this ploy, he even goes so far as to express false concern for Fortunato as they pass through the catacombs. Blaming the nitre and damp, the Montresor suggests that they turn back as not to compromise Fortunato’s ill health, though he has no intent of doing so. Never once until the very end did Fortunato have cause to suspect that there were any foul plans afoot.
In the epic poem Beowulf, the struggle between good and evil reveals its omnipresence in even the oldest of tales. The many allusions and symbols throughout the story relate to Christianity and other Pagan beliefs. By looking at them, it becomes apparent that the author of Beowulf believed that the constant war between good and evil is not only fought by the common man but also in the ranks of their highest esteemed rulers and warriors, and even in their dreaded nightmares where monsters lurk and wait for the death of man. Beowulf was written during the budding of Christianity in England, when it was newly forming. In the story there are obvious references to Christian rituals.
Even though Montesor has his traits of anger, hatred, and revenge on Fortunato from firmly believing in his family motto and arms, he shows signs of feeling guilty for wanting to kill Fortunato. He attempts to keep Fortunato from following him into the catacombs even though Fortunato still refuses, not know what was going to happen to him. However, at the very end of the story, Montesor seems to have lost all feelings of guiltiness when he says, “For half a century no mortal has disturbed [Fortunato’s grave]. In pace requiescat!” (Poe). ‘In pace requiescat, to me, means, “Rest in peace!” He finally done the deed and feels prideful.