How Does Baudelaire Present Samar As A Flaneur?

584 Words2 Pages

While Baudelaire, on the other hand, describes the flaneur as a "gentleman stroller of city streets”. He saw the flaneur as having a key role in understanding, participating in, and portraying the city. Mishra through the character of Samar portrays a completely new picture of not only the holy city of Benaras but also the other parts of India like Pondicherry, etc. He paints the character of Samar as a flaneur to make it convenient for the readers to understand the basic facts about the different places, as the main protagonist of the plot was taken from the common Indian middle-class throng. A flaneur thus played a double role in city life and in theory, which is, while remaining a detached observer. With the character of Samar who possesses the feature of a flaneur and the settings of the story, readers are manipulated to draw their attention towards the facts like transitions and difference in the culture and beliefs of east and west. …show more content…

While there are oases of splendor in rural regions, his settings typically function squalor: grotty housing, open and unorganized drains, mold and filth, and pungent overloaded trains. Anarchy reigns at the University, and there are so few opportunities for Samar’s era that it’s smooth for them to descend into crime. Despite the rhetoric about admire for women, there's lecherous goosing of women on the road. Poverty is everywhere, and whilst the modern financial system arises overdue in the novel, its manifestations are incongruous in Benares, the holiest Hindu metropolis in India. It is tawdry and shallow, with gaudy buildings and tasteless advertising and

Open Document