How Does Baldwin Use Self-Hatred In Going To Meet The Man

1802 Words4 Pages

James Baldwin
In Going to Meet the Man, James Baldwin introduces African-American experiences in different situations and describes the inner feelings of characters as they face hardships. One of the most common emotions portrayed throughout the individual stories was self-hatred. In “Come Out of the Wilderness” this emotion was shown through Ruth, a young black woman living in New York with her Caucasian boyfriend Paul. Throughout the short story, Ruth battles an internal struggle with fear that Paul will leave her, but not only was she mistrusting of Paul, Ruth had issues with all of the men in her life. These issues go back to her childhood and resulted from her brother shaming her for being caught with a boy alone (197-209). This situation …show more content…

After being exposed sexually for something she did not do, Ruth felt used and ashamed which ultimately lead to many issues in her relationship with Paul. Due to being sexual experienced, Ruth feared that Paul would leave her for someone more innocent. Ruth links innocence to race that results in her feeling self-hatred, such as when referring to the white women working in the life insurance office. While observing the women, she exclaimed that their “[innocence]… made her ashamed of her body”, and repeatedly refers to herself throughout the book as “black and dirty” (204-215). Due to her traumatic experience with her brother, sexuality makes her feel negatively and emphasizes her self-hatred. This self-hatred makes her continually question her relationship with Paul and her worth as a young black African-American. The short story comes to a close with Ruth at a bar pondering her relationship with Paul, who had vanished, and leaving the bar in tears not knowing where she was going (223-225). Ruth’s self-hatred causes her to question who she is, making her feel lost in a world that makes …show more content…

Throughout Washington Square, Catherine did her best to follow her father’s wishes and be respectful even when she did not agree with his opinions, at one point Catherine even discussed moving out of her father’s house because if she were to live under his roof, she should follow his rules (124). This type of respectful behavior was not uncommon in the nineteenth century, which explains why the revenge she got on her father was extremely subtle. Although it maddening to Dr. Sloper to not know the details of the ending of her relationship, it was ultimately Catherine’s business on whether she told what happened, making the revenge not a substantial vengeance. However, revenge in the twentieth century is not near as subtle and does not keep parental respect in mind like Catherine did. In the twentieth century women became more independent and began to put their feelings first, which resulted in their revenge being colder and intentional. Although Catherine was emotionally hurt by her father’s contempt for herself her revenge still had a level of respect, she did not yell or create emotional or physical harm, she just used her father’s invasiveness against him and withheld information. Although Catherine inheritance was still taken away from her, James never provided evidence that Catherine felt guilt or joy from causing her father discomfort.

Open Document