How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

664 Words2 Pages

“Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare, was written based on the events that took place in Rome around 45BC. It reflects on the betrayal of Caesar, whom Brutus called his friend. Julius Caesar was not a cocky Roman general with a lot of pride, but was a man that denied the crown three times. After the death of Caesar, Brutus and Antony both prepare funeral speeches to speak on his behalf. As Caesar’s loyal friend, Antony’s speech portrays the type of person Caesar was, but lacks ethical and logical strategies. Brutus’s speech effectively explains why the killing of Caesar was for the good of Rome. He incorporates his personal beliefs, frequently uses emotion, and gives logic reasons, which makes his speech more argumentative than Antony’s. …show more content…

Brutus’s speech was so potent that it allowed the plebeians to view the situation from his point of view. His use of logos answers the questions as to why he did what he did which makes his argument strong. He made it evident that he’d done wrong for a good reason, but Brutus let his believability get the best of him. His entire speech is based on the rhetorical strategy ethos because he did not witness what type of emperor Caesar would have been, yet he uses the appropriate tone to make the audience understand how he felt. “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him… as he was valiant, I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” (Act 3, Scene 2) Logical explanations make a strong argument. It ties together every bit and piece of a statement. Antony’s speech contains more pathos and very little logos. Emotion can make the audience content, yet it does not prove anything. His use of ethos changes the perspective of the plebeians and makes them realize that Caesar did not deserve the treatment he received for being a successful Roman general. “This was the most unkindest cut if all… for when the noble Caesar saw him stab… then burst his mighty heart.” (Act 3, Scene

Open Document