Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of the Mongol conquest
Positive and negative impact of Mongol conquest
Positive and negative impact of Mongol conquest
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of the Mongol conquest
The Ottomans, successors to the Seljuks in the Balkans, were planning a decisive assault on the Byzantine Empire. Sultan Bayezid using the Balkans as his base, hoped to join Europe with Asia by taking Constantinople and western Anatolia. In 1402 Timur routed Bayezid’s forces at the battle of Ankara. The sultan himself was captured by Timur. Timur used Bayezid as a footstool. Imprisoned in a cage so small, Bayezid died.
Constantinople was saved from Ottoman assault, but Timur’s victory gave no comfort to the Christians. Timur moved east to prepare his forces for the largest invasion of his career, but while doing so he drank more wine than his 69-year-old body could absorb and died of alcohol poisoning in 1405. Timur Lenk was an impressive
…show more content…
When he died, nothing could hold his lands together. He leveled everything in his path and then vanished, leaving others to rebuild what he had destroyed.
The Seljuk Turks, the Mongols, and Timur Lenk had brought war and destruction, but none proved to hold empires together. Timur conquered in the name of Islam, not as its enemy. And Mongol advances in Southwest Asia were stopped by Egypt’s Muslim Mamluk rulers, conquered by invaders known as the Ottoman Turks. A Turkic-speaking nomadic group led by a man named Osman arrived in Anatolia, fleeing westward from the Mongols. They were polytheists but were eventually converted to Sunni Islam by the Seljuk Turks. The Seljuk state collapsed, and the Ottomans took over as champions of the Muslim.
Murad was an exceptional ruler who refused to impose Islamic or Ottoman forms of government in the Balkans. He laid the foundation of a religiously and ethnically pluralistic society that would create a stable Ottoman Peace. The primary concern of Murad and his successors was to promote Islam. Murad, slain by a Serb at Kosovo in 1389, was succeeded by his son Bayezid
…show more content…
A sensible and enlightened ruler, Iletmish did what he could to reconcile India’s Hindu majority to Islamic rule. The Delhi Sultanate’s authority crumbled rapidly. The losses weakened Delhi so profoundly that it was unable to resist the catastrophic invasion of Timur Lenk.
India in 1500 was a land in turmoil, divided by religion, culture, and politics. Into this situation stepped the last Timurid, Babur, whose name means “the Panther,” a fifth-generation descendant of Timur Lenk and a 13th-generation descendant of Genghis Khan. The Mughals called themselves Gurkani, a Mongolian term for son-in-law; Timur Lenk had married two descendants of Genghis Khan. But Arabic- and Persian-speaking Muslims called them alMughul, or Mongols, and the name
After the fall of the Roman Empire, a new empire, the Byzantine Empire, arose out of the eastern half of Byzantium. Byzantium stood partway along the straits between the Aegean Sea and the Black Sea. It occupied the tip of a small peninsula, with a body of water to the South called the Sea of Marmara, which led to a passage called the Bosporus. The site that Constantine chose to be the new capital was a town called ...
Unlike most “victimized” cultures of Western European domination, the Ottoman Empire was considerably successful and powerful for many years, particularly in the sixteenth and early seventeenth century under the rule of Sulayman the Magnificent (Haberman, 132). By 1520, the Ottoman Empire had secured much of the Arab Middle East, Belgrade and most of Hungary (Haberman, 132...
However, Tughril was different from Chingiz Khan because he initially established his rule upon the notion that he would be the protector of the caliphate. The Muslim dominance in Iran required Tughril’s ideological standpoint to accept historical understandings of rulership, thereby no overthrowing the caliphate, but by legitimizing themselves through establishing their own caliphate. Comparably, Broadbridge supports the perception of the Mamluk Sultanate being an Islamic ruler as opposed the view held by the Ilkhanids who saw them as a rebel dichotomy. These concepts differentiated the way a Khan verses a Sultan went about their rule in regions that were predominately Islamic. And although rulers focused on making decisions that made clear distinctions between each other, appealing to the Muslim community or “rightfully overthrowing them” was a necessity in and around Iran. No, there did not seem to be any inclination of a democratic sway threatening kings, khans, and sultans around the fourteenth century, but deviating too far from historical expectations could lead to issues of upholding a nation’s centralized
Spielvogel, Jackson J. "The Muslim Empires: The Ottoman Empire.” Glencoe World History. New York, NY: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, 2005. p.484-489. Print.
The Ottoman Empire were Muslims and included Hungary, Syria, Egypt, Bulgaria, and Albania, and they marched on land. The Ottoman Empire is said to have first appeared somewhere around the 1300’s, and can be related to the decline of the Byzantine Empire. They began conquering Christian lands and by the late 1600’s all Christians were afraid of the “terrible Turk”. It is no wonder that many other people were afraid of the Ottoman Empire since they seem to be really rather powerful and they conquered a lot of land. It was in the 1330’s when the Morroccan Abu Abdallah Ibn Battuta passed through Constantinople and became impressed with the Ottomans who seemed to be gaining power rather quickly, he noticed that they had close to 100 forts and
Genghis Khan, or Ghengis Khan as he is more widely known, was born about the year 1162 to a Mongol chieftain, Yesugei, and his wife. He was born with the name of Temujin, which means ’iron worker’ in his native language. When Temujin was born his fist was clutching a blood clot which was declared an omen that he was destined to become a heroic warrior.Very little is known of Temujin until he was around age 13 when his father declared that his son was to find a fiancée and get married. After several days of travel Temujin and Yesugei came across a tribe of Mongols that were very hospitable and welcoming. Temujin was not there long when he noticed a certain girl, Borte the daughter of the chieftain. She was destined to become his wife. Temujin’s father died when Temüjin was still young, poisoned by a group of Tatars. The Tatars were the chief power on the eastern Mongolia at the time, and long- time rivals of the Mongols. When Temujin heard how his father had died, vowed one day to avenge the death.
In the year of 1206, when Chinggis Khan who hailed from the grasslands of Mongolia was declared leader, he had brought about the Mongol, Tatar and Turkish tribes into one unified alliance. (Mckay. 245) The
The Mongol invasions of the 13th century resulted in the far-reaching and vastly influential Mongol Empire. While these conquests brought much bloodshed and many atrocities, they were exceedingly important as they made the world more connected than ever before. At the heart of the Mongol Empire was its creator and first emperor, Genghis Khan. This “Great Khan” was able to unite nomadic tribes to form a shockingly powerful empire. Without him, the Mongol Empire likely would have never came to be. Genghis Khan’s strong and persistent character is the reason for this great empire that truly altered the world in a tremendous manner.
It was in 1206 that Genghis Khan (Chinggis Khan) was appointed ruler, of what is now known as “Mongolia”. Genghis Khan born by the name of Termujin was the son of Yisugei. Temujin was later awarded the title Chinggis, which is thought to mean "Oceanic Ruler," (Lane, 2006) . Genghis started leading with the intention of his people’s survival, and to keep his tribes happy. His innovations in law and organisation were the traits that built the foundation, on which he used to expand his empire. Genghis khan is the most well know leader of the Mongolian empire, in under 20 years, this great leader would lead the nomadic tribes out from the Eurasian steppes in order to conquer the mighty Chin Empire of northern China, as well as overrun the Islamic kingdom who had ruled the west. Once Genghis khan had a small taste of power he grew it into a conviction of spiritual righteousness, the Mongolians started to carry the banner of Tengri, the god of the sky. They used their s...
As we look back into both long moments in history, we can see how the two, while starting out along the same path and beliefs, had branched away from one another. These differences, whether influences by outside or internal sources, helped shape not only the future for their worlds but also for ours. If it had not been for Constantinople’s prime trade location, or had they ignored the opportunity, they too could have easily stifled their economic and cultural growth. While the Medieval Western European culture was slower to expand, they did eventually blossom, prosper and survive.
The Mongol Empire appeared in Central Asia through the 13th and 14th centuries as the biggest land empire in history. A consequence of the union of Mongol and Turkic tribes, the empire took form under the control of the legendary Genghis Khan, also known as Great Khan, which means emperor. All through his period, Genghis Khan started a series of invasions called as the Mongol invasions, frequently accompanied by the major-scale slaughter of civilian populations. This led in the conquest of the majority of Eurasia. By the end of Genghis Khan's life, the Mongol Empire occupied a considerable segment of Central Asia and China. The empire began to divide as a consequence of battles between succession heirs, especially regarding Kublai Khan and Ariq Boke.
Though one should consider the argument by some historians that the Byzantine Empire was really a continuation of the Roman empire and not in fact a new entity. The Byzantine Empire had been formed in Late Antiquity by the splitting of the Roman empire between the two heirs of Theodosius I. While the two halves retained some ties for all intents and purposes the two were independent entities after 395 CE. While the Western Empire continued to decline, the Byzantines actually flourished and by the 4th century included the Balkans, Greece, Anatolia (Asia Minor), the Levant, and parts of North Africa including Egypt. While Byzantium’s power fluctuated, especially during conflicts with the Islamic civilization and during internal wars, for the majority of its history the Byzantine Empire was a strong political, cultural and economic power in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Significant conflicts in the 11th century caused the Byzantine Empire to decline and this decline was made worse by the Sack of Constantinople in 1204 by the Venetian Crusaders. After this defeat, Byzantium was split into two portions and remained so until 1261 when it was reunified. However, the damage was done and internal conflict and civil war continued to plague the Empire until it ultimately was destroyed by the Ottoman Turks in
In 1206, Temujin became known as Genghis Khan, which means “oceanic ruler”, and the Mongol tribes became unified as the Great Mongol Nation. Because the spoils of conquest were used to reward and pay the soldiers, Genghis Khan...
...ng religion and foreign to the people of India, yet there is a defied truth that Islam’s spread peacefully throughout India with the alliances formed between the Indian people, the Turks, and the Mongols. The encounters that the ancient Indian people had to endure with the Turks, Mongols, and Islam have had the most memorable impact and impression on Indian culture and other societies throughout the east. Ancient Indian history is often overlooked within our society, but perhaps there should be a second look at how the Indian people have became who they are today, what attributes that have given society, and what pandemonium they have overcame as a civilization to stay in existence and stand against the test of time.
Much like that of the Byzantines before them, the Ottoman Empire served as a link between Europe and Asia, and greatly benefited from the profits of the exchange that was perennially flowing over these geographic boundaries; this era came to be known as the Golden Age of the Ottoman Empire. Although there can be many identifications and definitions for the means by which the Ottoman Empire was able to exert such a powerful degree of influence, military right, and cultural dynamism. It will be the purpose of this analysis to discuss and analyze the means by which a continual process of centralization can ultimately be understood as one defining force, that allowed the Ottoman Empire to thrive throughout this period of the “Golden Age.”