The Mongol empire was tolerant of other people groups that they conquered, but they were way more barbaric towards other people and places that they were trying to capture.
The Mongols battle tactics are really cool. they organize their army in groups of ten. then groups of one hundred, they are also organized in groups of 1000 and 10,000. When the Mongols were trying to take fortresses they use catapults to sling rocks at the enemy. They also do not stop fighting when the night comes. They have men that rest while other men will be shooting arrows at the enemy through the night so the enemy never got any rest during the night.
The Mongols killed a lot of people trying to capture all of the land that they did. They killed 800,000 to 2,000,000 people trying to capture the Persians.when they raided the Kozelsk people they killed all of them.The Mongols also executed the persian’s that they captured by shooting them point blank in the chest with arrows and they buried their heads in the ground while they are still alive.
…show more content…
so they tried to attack like they are use to doing,But because of how advanced the Chinese were the Mongols retreated. Then they surrounded China and they stopped all supplies and people from going in our out of China.Basically turning China into a prison People inside started to starve and die.When the Mongols finally captured China they integrated into the Chinese population, but the two religions of the Chinese and the Mongols had very little in common so the two religions followed different rules.During the Mongol rule the Mongol ruler named kublai khan did appoint some chinese officials but he higher up positions were saved for the Mongols or
To start, the mongols were able to used brutal and strategic military tactics that helped them conquer more than 4,800,000 miles of land. The Mongols leader “Genghis Khan” was a very smart and strategic leader. He organized his army into groups of ten, hundred, and one thousand. If such groups runs away or flees, the entire group was put to death. Genghis Khans army was able to succeed in conquering land due to horses. His army
Despite the fact that Mongolians were prejudiced against other cultures, they were, in fact, not barbaric but rather civilized because of their gender equality of people and how advanced their cities were. In The Book of Ser Marco Polo, Polo tells us how beautiful and well protected the city was like. For instance, the text explains how the city was protected by two great powerful walls surrounding the entire city. Only well advanced and civilized people can do such a thing such as creating an enormous wall. If the Mongolians were barbaric they wouldn’t have even thought of protection.. In Addition, the way the city looked also proved that they were civilized and not barbaric.
Mongol rule between nations both varied and shared many similarities. Both China and Russia were incorporated into the ever expanding Mongol empire. The massive expanses of land each civilization contained would help to increase the power the Mongols had. This would also help them to control more of Eurasia. Many people were killed during the brutal wars the Mongols started to try and conquer land. They were power hungry and destroyed everything that got in the way of their conquests. The Mongols never assimilated into neither Chinese nor Russian culture. This led to rebellions against the Mongols in both Chinese and Russian areas.
There has been great conversation about whether the Mongols were barbarians or acted Barbaric throughout their lifetime. When looking at the Mongol civilization to determine if they are barbaric or not depends on several factors, what does barbaric mean, how do the Mongol cities act, and how do their people act away from their cities. The major thing to look at when determining if the Mongols are barbaric, what classifies a barbarian and what does it mean to be barbaric. We can see that in the times of ancient Rome, barbarians are just foreigners to their land. The term barbaric has changed as time has changed from being a foreigner to acting uncivilized and being a savage people. So if we are using the old Roman term for barbarian; then yes the Mongols were barbarians, but we are
The Mongols were definitely a civilized group, just not in the sense that most people see civilization. The mongols were civilized in the ways that they acted in warfare, even if it often seems that they were not, in the ways that they governed their people, and they were of great aid to the development of societies all over the world.
The military exploits of the Mongols under Ghengis Khan as well as other leaders and the ruthless brutality that characterized the Mongol conquests have survived in legend. The impact of the invasions can be traced through history from the different policies set forth to the contributions the Mongols gave the world. The idea of the ruthless barbarian’s intent upon world domination will always be a way to signify the Mongols. Living steadfast upon the barren steppe they rode out of Mongolia to pursue a better life for their people.
The Mongols in 1241 invaded Poland with the intent of also taking Hungary. The Mongols under the leadership of Ogadei the son and chosen successor of Genghis Khan had been gaining control of Western Russia since 1236 and were in position to invade Europe. The appearance and disappearance of the Mongols in Europe was sudden. By December 1241 they returned to Mongolia after the death of Ghenghis Khan’s successor Ogadei to take part in the election of a new leader. They accomplished their objective of eliminating the threat of Henry II’s and Boseslav’s armies. Conquest of Europe had to be abandoned as a result the Mongols only accomplished the slaughter of numerous Europeans and the temporary occupation of a swath of land. Europeans attributed the military victories of the Mongols to the Mongols being not entirely human and supernatural in some way. The triumph of the Mongols was due to their discipline and tactics.
The Xi Xia, also known as the Western Xia Dynasty was a kingdom populated by the Tanguts. As a fairly small state, Xi Xia struggled for dominance with its larger and more powerful neighbors, the Liao, the Jin, and the Song dynasty. Afterward, the Mongol Empire emerged and saw the benefits of taking over Xi Xia. The Mongols launched their first invasion on Xi Xia in 1209, but the Xi Xia was able to withstand it. However, in 1227, the Mongols were able to succeed in taking over Xi Xia with a complete annihilation. The Mongols were able to conquer Xi Xia because of their motivation in conquering Xi Xia, the Mongols’ informants that were sent throughout China, the vulnerability of Xi Xia’s location, the Mongols’ alliance with the Ongut, the
The Mongols built an empire that stretched from the Pacific Ocean to the Baltic Sea. One of the richest parts of that empire was the land of the Rus - but how did the Mongols conquer it so quickly? This lesson examines how, as well as how the Mongols ruled their new territory.
When discussing Asian history, countries or empires such as China and India are frequently mentioned. China and India are indeed important in Asian history, but a giant player, who played an irreplaceable role in the development of Asia, is missing. It is the Mongols. The Mongols established large secular states, increased the scale of trades, and promoted religion coexistence that accelerated the development and integration of regions in the Asia’s Circulatory System.
The Mongols were a group of nomadic people who were known for not only their ferocity in battle but also their tolerance of other cultures. Over the course of their many empires, the Mongols conquered lands from as far as the Korean peninsula to the Islamic civilizations of the Middle East. The movement of the Mongol people into these areas was met with mixed opinions, as members of some societies respected the braveness of the Mongols while others saw them as destructive. According to Ala-ad-Din Ata-Malik Juvaini, 15th century Korean scholars, and Rashid al-Din, the Mongols were a group of tolerant people who attempted to eradicate injustice and corruptness (1,3,4). However, members of other societies viewed the Mongols as coldhearted and merciless because of the damage they dealt in the conquest of Russian cities and the taxes they forced upon their conquered societies (1,2). Nonetheless, some scholars and historians recognized the Mongols power and braveness, but were indifferent with their views of the Mongol civilization.
The Mongols could be considered barbarians because of the violent and barbaric war tactics they used to instill fear in people. They often took advantage of their organized army to carry out many of these military tactics. When the Mongols attacked places such as fortresses, they would first surround it, breaking up their army into groups and periodically switched them so that they could attack day and night while the fortresses inhabitants tired themselves out trying to protect themselves (Doc 3). When they were not able to capture the fortress like this, they would take the fat of enemies they killed, and, after melting it, they would catapult it onto houses and set fire to it; these fires were nearly impossible to put out (Doc 3). The Mongols would also often take over entire cities, slaying all its inhabitants and burning it to the ground after taking any valuables. ...
They were especially fascinated by Chinese culture, however, the Mongols never treated them fairly. Government positions were always given to the Mongol people; natives were not to be trusted with too much power. In East Asia, Mongols were especially attracted to Lamaist Buddhism, and worshipped it all while staying loyal to their native culture cults. The syncretic ways that Mongols adopted changed the culture in East Asia and allowed Buddhists to be more than tolerant. Even Lamaist Buddhists recognized the Mongols as their rulers. In the Ilkhanate of Persia, religious tolerance erupted too, also changing cultural ways. Islam, Nestorian Christians, Buddhists, and Jews were more welcomed by the Mongols. The Ilkanate Ghazan even converted to Islam, which led to the religion to dominate Persia. Mongols ruling the area culturally impacted the Southwest Asia and East Asia
The two keys for his army are his army composition and his ingenious strategies. His army composition was out of this world, he had soldiers being created from the time they were born and sometimes even the women fought in the war. The soldiers wore armor in the same fashion like the Japanese Samurai(like the richer or higher class you're born in, the better armor.) Some poor soldiers went into battle with just a bow and arrows. The average warrior wore effectively, a lightweight suit of armor made from layered panels of leather stitched together by animal sinews. (this armor is called lamellar, but it was not a Mongol invention.) each and every soldier carried two bows and three quivers containing 30 arrows in each. Included two types of arrows lighter ones and highly sharpened points for long distance. And heavier ones with broader points for short and close range fighting. Most Mongol Soldier carried a curved, single edged-saber, a lance with a hook for pulling opponents from their Saddles, a battle ax a knife, and occasionally a javelin, and a heavy club. Most carried a kit with a small cooking pot, and awl for sinews for repairing armor, a file to sharpen weapons, fishing line, a horsehair lasso, and two leather bottles. And was carried in waterproof bags what could be inflated to help soldiers across ford rivers. Horses were covered in lamellar armor, with a 10-pound saddle. For every 10 soldiers, there was a horse with