Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Queen Victoria's influence
Queen Victoria's influence
Queen Victoria's impact on British history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Rulers not only have the pressure to gain the respect of their followers, but also the stress of trying to leave a significant impact on the lives of others. Queen Victoria grew up unaware of the fact that she would later become one of England’s longest to reign. At the time of Queen Victoria’s rule, the British Parliament established major restrictions on the power of the British monarchy. Slowly, the balance of political power tipped away from the monarch’s responsibilities. Unlike past rulers, Queen Victoria, known for her tenacity, did not allow others to restrict her from doing as she desired. Queen Victoria’s long reign demonstrated that although the British Parliament heavily restricted the British monarchy of power, a determined ruler …show more content…
When Victoria came to throne, the British empire along with the Industrial Revolution continued to rise, which allowed for the bankers and manufacturers rising to political power to repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, the Municipal Reform Act, and the Reform Bill (Briggs et al. 46). Both wealth and outraged pride proved to be demanded through these acts. The Reform Bill had transformed England into a constitutional monarchy, allowing for the absolute powers to become more moral than legislative. The industrial development allowed new machines for manufacturing and communication to be invented, leading to an increased amount of developments such as canals, roads, and railways. While Queen Victoria “cared little for the company of scientists,” she showed an interest in “the bravery of British troops in the Crimea” (Briggs et al. 38). Unlike most of the people, she stuck to tradition and did not completely approve of the new innovations. Queen Victoria’s “dismissal of growing demands for social reform” coincided with the era’s spirit of change (“Victoria”). Her resistance to change provoked the people of Britain to lose trust for her. Her ambitions for imperialism, particularly in India, allowed for her to maintain her popularity after Prince Albert’s passing, along with her support in colonial wars such as the Crimean War and the Boer War (“Victoria”). Due to Prince Albert’s passing and her adherence to tradition, people lost trust in Victoria, but her interest in imperialism and wars allowed for her to keep it. Rulers in the years to follow would learn from Victoria to always try their best to gain the approval of their people, regardless of how they may feel about a
One monarch who faced limited royal power due to his relationship with parliament was Henry IV. This uneasy relationship was mainly down to the fact that Henry was a usurper, and was exacerbated by his long periods of serious illness later in his reign. Parliament was thus able to exercise a large amount of control over royal power, which is evident in the Long Parliament of 1406, in which debates lasted from March until December. The length of these debates shows us that Henry IV’s unstable relationship had allowed parliament to severely limit his royal power, as he was unable to receive his requested taxation. A king with an amiable relationship with parliament, such as Henry V, and later Edward IV, would be much more secure in their power, as taxation was mostly granted, however their power was also supported more by other factors, such as popularity and finances. Like Henry IV, Henry VI also faced severely limited power due to his relationship with parliament.
A Fierce Discontent by Michael McGerr delves into the revolution of values from the victorian era to the progressive within the late nineteen century to the early twentieth century. McGerr’s major argument is the contrast between this set of values. The gilded age which McGerr focuses is the period where progressive values begin to take form and societal change ensues. The victorian values are values which epitomizes the British culture as just the name of the era is derived from queen Victoria. Alternatively the progressive era was a political reform focusing on anti corruption, women suffrage, and fixing the social problems plaguing society. McGerr argues that the victorian era and progressive era strikes few similarities within the
The Austrian, Habsburg Empire and England faced issues common to many European nations of the time. Religion and leadership were at the forefront of these crises. What set the two nations apart and ensured England’s survival was that England, not necessarily consciously, made improvements to their government while they addressed their smaller individual problems. With each growing pain came compromise. Through compromise, the English developed into a Constitutional Monarchy; this representative type of government, guided by a Bill of Rights, established checks and balances that inherently support a strong, unified nation as opposed to the self interests of individual factions.
"THE RELIGION OF THE QUEEN - TIME FOR CHANGE." University of Queensland Law Journa (2011): n. pag. Web.The British monarchy is a system of government in which a traditional monarch is the sovereign of the United Kingdom out of the country territories, and holds the constitutional position of head of state. According to the article, the Queen's powers are exercised upon the suggestion of her prime minister. Moreover, she firmly reserves powers which she may exercise at her own discretion. The Queen has many theoretical personal advantages and disadvantages. One disadvantages was that UK prohibits her from get married with a catholic member either being a roman catholic. However, with the exception of the appointment of the major minister, which is done with every prime minister, there are few positions in modern British government where these could be justifiably exercised; they have rarely been exercised in the last century. These powers could be exercised in an emergency such as a constitutional
In England, the parliament because of this need, grew to have power over the king and cause great toleration of people's
He had to make sure at all times that all rules or laws were followed and if not he had to make punishments for them. George was a king so whatever decision he made went, and nobody else could change his mind. Usually, Parliament is there to help guide the King and his decisions, but King George took many things upon himself numerous times without guidance from Parliament. King George had many disagreement with Parliament. The population in Great Britain at the time was fairly high, and George had many responsibilities. King George went through rough times as being King but always found a way through the problems. He took and controlled Great Britain through many battles and wars including the American Revolution. King George was the man behind the American Revolution, and the fighting between the colonists and the
A1. England was run by a Parliament and per history had very limited involvement of the monarchy or direct rule by the king. As well as the colonial legislatures; members were elected by property-holding men and governors were given authority to make decisions on behalf of the king. This system our leadership and how it controls its people the reason many
Machiavelli wrote that a ruler should be both like “a lion and a fox” (The Prince, Chapter XVIII). By this Machiavelli means that a ruler should be like a lion to keep away the wolves that can get to the fox who finds the traps that the lion could get into. Essentially, a ruler should be cunning and powerful. Elizabeth I of England and Louis XIV of France fit these characteristics. Louis XIV acted as a lion in such ways as the Edict of Fontainebleau which took away the power of the Huguenots. Elizabeth I of England was like a lion because she married her country, not a man, therefore keeping all power to herself and frightening away the “wolves.” Louis XIV acted as a fox by getting away from the “traps” of the nobility by heavily taxing them because he did not want to relive the Fronde, a civil war where he was humiliated by nobles (Tom Richey, Louis XIV Rap 0:27-0:31). Elizabeth acted as a fox because she was religiously tolerant and kept England away from “traps” that could lead to wars.
The British Monarchy of Henry VII led England into a new path of modernism through politics, culture and social aspects. His addition of more modern, while keeping the good from the former style helped him build his monarchy the way he wanted. Henry didn't just bring renovations but a nonviolent environment for everyone. King Henry VII influenced a positive change between the Lancastrians and Yorkist and expanded the British monarchy. He accom-plished his purpose by being the change he wanted to see in England.
The monarchy symbolizes unity and traditions, which is unique and treasured to the nation. The monarch universally known as head of the Commonwealth, she is voluntarily recognised as the Head of State to 54 independent countries (The British Monarchy, 2013) The Queen to modern Britain, is an icon, who cannot simply be swapped for an elected politician. The British monarchy has played huge importance in British history, which is integral to our national identity. The Queen reined for 61 years and she provides an existing connection between the past, present and future. This is exactly what a politician could not offer to the public; for instance, Tony Blair, prior to 1997 was unknown on a state level, as he had done nothing significant for the British public. The monarchy’s traditions are famous not only in the United Kingdom but throughout the world. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is the ruler of sixteen other countries including Britain. Whilst the queen receives many privileges as head of state, it does come at a personal cost. Her privacy is limited as she is consistently scrutinized from t...
The challenges to the power of the Monarch was by the reign of James I (1603-25) the monarch was faced with an increasing effective Parliament, culminating in the temporary abolition of the monarchy in (1625). Consequently, the monarchy’s powers were eroded by both revolution and by legal challenges, which included the case of Proclamations (1611) , the monarchy could not change the law by proclamation. The law of the land, which required that the law be made by Parliament, limited the prerogative. In the case of Prohibitions Del Roy (1607) the Monarch had no right to act as a judge, and in the case of the Ship Money Case (1637), although th...
...ed heavily on public subsidy, and the gas and electricity companies had in many cases developed as municipal undertakings. They seem of proper national concern. The iron and steel industry proved more controversial, being denationalized and renationalized in subsequent years. In international affairs the Attlee government introduces a major change of direction, beginning the dismantling of the British Empire. The empire becomes gradually transformed into a Commonwealth of independent nations, capable of accommodating republics as well as monarchies.
"History in Focus." : The Victorian Era (Introduction). Institute of Historical Research., Apr. 2001. Web. 29 Mar. 2014.
The Victorian Era in English history was a period of rapid change. One would be hard-pressed to find an aspect of English life in the 19th century that wasn’t subject to some turmoil. Industrialization was transforming the citizens into a working class population and as a result, it was creating new urban societies centered on the factories. Great Britain enjoyed a time of peace and prosperity at home and thus was extending its global reach in an era of New Imperialism. Even in the home, the long held beliefs were coming into conflict.
It is well known that the British political system is one of the oldest political systems in the world. Obviously, it was formed within the time. The United Kingdom of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the constitutional monarchy, providing stability, continuity and national focus. The monarch is the head of state, but only Parliament has the right to create and undertake the legislation. The basis of the United Kingdom’s political system is a parliamentary democracy. Therefore, people think the role of the Queen as worthless and mainly unnecessarily demanding for funding, but is it like that?