How Did Patrick Henry Use Emotional Appeal In Revolutionary Literature

454 Words1 Page

In colonial and revolutionary literature, people were persuasive. To persuade someone is to cause someone to something through reasoning or argument. That's how people got what they wanted. Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, and Thomas Jefferson were all persuasive writers. They wrote with rhetorical questions, repetition, exaggeration, and emotional appeal. Patrick Henry wrote Speech in the Virginia Convention. One persuasive method used was emotional appeal. An example of this would be when he said "We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth,, an listen to that song of siren, till she transforms us into beasts." He used emotional appeal to make his reader feel bad. Another method would be his use of rhetorical questions. One of the questions he wrote was "IS this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?" This rhetorical Question was asked to show a point. In addition to those two, exaggeration was also a key to his percussion. He stated that "there is no longer room for hope" when there is. He was being dramatic. …show more content…

He used rhetorical questions, emotional appeal, and exaggeration. One of the rhetorical questions used is "what signifies it to me, but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to 'bind me in all cases whatsoever' too his absolute will, am I to suffer it?" This is a rhetorical question because there is no need to answer it. The answer is obvious. He, like Patrick Henry, also used emotional appeal. "I once felt all that anger, which a man ought to feel, against the mean principles that are held by the Tores: a noted one...'Well! give me peace in my day!'" was a use of emotional appeal. Exaggeration was also used in The Crisis. Exaggeration was shown when he said "Not a place upon earth be so happy as America." which is an exaggerated

Open Document