How Did Napoleon Get Into Power In Animal Farm

Dictators cannot obtain power just off of force, but a with combination of tactics and support. George Orwell, the author of Animal Farm depicts the events that happened during the Russian Revolution under a dictator, using a comparison of Napoleon, a fictional character who takes full authority of a farm. One of many real life dictators include, Ne Win who gradually takes over in power. Napoleon, a dictator in Animal Farm shares multiple similarities with Ne Win, a dictator from Burma. Both Napoleon and Ne Win slyly bring their way into power, oppress individual rights of their citizens, and mercilessly slaughter their people. The power a dictator gains can differ depending on how it is acquired, however in most cases a similar method is

For instance, Napoleon bans the anthem, Beasts of England (Orwell 62). The Beasts of England symbolizes change for the animals from absolute oppression to freedom. However, when Napoleon prohibits it, it represents the farm going back under being ruled under a dictatorship again. Additionally, there is a food ration that is introduced by Napoleon where there is a cut in the amount of food given, however it does not apply to the pigs, nor the dogs (Orwell 77). The food supply is short, which is what results in the food portions getting cut, however the portions given differ drastically from the animals to the dogs and the pigs. Comparatively, Ne Win also “abolished Parliament and the constitution, transforming Burma into a one-party police state”(“Ne” 2). Prior to this change, Burma was under a parliamentary government. However, with this alternation, he changes the constitution and a dictatorship is put into place. Also similarly, Ne Win “necessitated food rationing to avoid famine” (“Ne” 2). The cut is caused by the economic policies Ne Win has in place, resulting in the country’s exportation ceasing. For the most part, both, Ne win and Napoleon bear a similar approach on their creations of rules and policies during their time in ultimate

For instance, Napoleon threatens the hens by decreasing their food portions after their protest (Orwell 53). The hens did not protest just to rebel, but it is a cry towards their health. Napoleon uses his greed to take advantage of the hens, who provide eggs, and makes them produce a ridiculous amount to pay the debt he creates. Also, he makes the animals confess their crimes, then orders their death instantly (Orwell 58-59). The animals who he slaughters are not a small quantity, but rather he goes on to have a mass killing, where he gave no mercy to any of them. It is here where fear is what he ingrains in their mind about those who dared to rebel, or protest against his beliefs and ideas. Corresponding to this, Ne Win does something similar, “he ordered shots faired at student demonstrators opposed to the junta, killing about one hundred of them (Lutz 773). All these deaths are cut to one factor and that is protesting.Without even a thought about the young lives, he massacres them all. Equally as important, is the suppression that Ne Win takes into his hands. For him to “shut down the pro-democracy movement, Ne Win uses the army to shoot, torture, and jail thousands of its followers” (“Ne” 2). This came as a warning to others who tries to change the ways of the government, and to prevent any alteration within his powers. In either cases, there is no doubt that shared qualities of the