How Did Hitler Get A Fair Trial

407 Words1 Page

During World War 2, the Allies were determined that both Hitler and the men around him should be punished for starting the war. Not long after Hitler became Chancellor, in 1933, he and his Nazi Government began giving policies to subject Jewish people. After lots of debate, it was decided that the fairest way to proceed was the public trial of the men who committed the crimes. Hitler was one of the Nazi officials who was going to be put on trial. Himmler and Goebbels were also going to be put on trial, but they committed suicide at the end of the war. At the trials, 22 individual Nazi officials and seven groups that had carried out the Nazi programs, were placed on trial for their crimes. “The Allies charged the individuals with four types of crimes: conspiracy against peace, crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.” If Hitler would have been at the trials, he would have been charged because he was a Nazi leader. In the trials, 24 Nazi leaders were put on trial, 18 …show more content…

He would have been sentenced to death, because many thought what he did was wrong. The Nuremberg Trials would have differed a lot if Hitler wouldn’t have committed suicide. There would have been lots of punishment towards Hitler because of all the crimes he committed during the war. He was a Nazi leader, and the leaders were the ones who got punished the most. Hitler would have been punished more than the others because he was the one wanting to kill the Jewish people. After researching about Hitler and learning about the Nuremberg trials, I have learned that the trials were a big event in Germany. There were many Nazi people who attended the trials who got punished. The Nuremberg trials are now regarded as a milestone toward the establishment as an international court. These trials were also an important situation for dealing with other crimes and events against

Open Document