Horkheimer And Adorno

517 Words2 Pages

According to Horkheimer and Adorno (H&A), the way in which people navigate their surrounding world is through one of projection. Specifically, this projection involves distinguishing “between their own thoughts and feelings and those of others”. Eventually, “a distinction emerges between outer and inner, the possibility of detachment and of identification, self-consciousness and conscience”. Problems arise then, when false projection is committed, leading to a confusion of ownership regarding what is truly intrinsic to the self. When people are unaware of the parts of themselves that are susceptible to external influence, they fall victim easily to manipulation. Furthermore, when people cast aside qualities of themselves and falsely project them onto others, it distorts their perceptions of reality at large, causing them to antagonize those who, in their delusion, personified the traits that they themselves reviled. The consequences of false projection are thus severe. H&A for example, …show more content…

In the case of projection, to reflect is to properly recognize all of the faculties we possess. Much of the enlightenment has based its legitimacy on a sort of instrumental rationality, and often neglects to recognize the importance of human emotions, or the merits of a phenomenological approach to issues. “Thought, stripped down to knowledge, is neutralized” and reduced to a formula so that the “individual no longer has to decide what he or she is supposed to do in a given situation in a painful inner dialogue between conscience, self-preservation, and drives”. Decision making transforms into a detached balancing of pros and cons, without actual investment from the subject itself. Enlightenment must thus reflect and reorient itself to embrace the multi-facet-ness of human nature, and normalize them as methods of dealing with oneself and the world around

Open Document