Hook Sentence: Should Books Be Banned

488 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on banning books

Banned Books For Beginners
Introduction: Hook Sentence - Should books be banned? Reasons why some books shouldn’t be banned are religion (That is not religion), Dumb Reasons, and Racism (That is not racism). Reasons for not doing it: DUMB REASONS. Charlotte’s web“The verdict: Parents argued that “humans are the highest level of God’s creation and are the only creatures that can communicate vocally. Showing lower life forms with human abilities is sacrilegious and disrespectful to God.”It means that they literally banned a book because the animals talked. And it is important because it is extremely dumb that they banned the book because of animals talking. "Use of aliens to present weather information." The Book: Earth Weather, as Explained …show more content…

People ban books for dumb reasons that make absolutely no sense. Another is dumb religious reasons. Ministers and educators challenged it (it being the wonderful wizard of oz) for its “ungodly” influence and for depicting women in strong leadership roles They banned the wizard of oz because it showed girls in a leadership role (what?).This is really important because they are banning a classic book because the princess was a thing that people got really people got upset with it. “Others accuse the novel of attacks on religion, the disabled and women.” Lord of the flies (“http://www.banned-books.org.uk/sections/corrosive”). Once again PC police have come again to shut down another book that is actually pretty good.Also once again imagination is not encouraged. Don’t ban books for religious reasons that are not valid. Finally racism (that is not racism). “"A review of the book in question shows it to include pervasive vulgarity and racially insensitive language,"(The Hate you Give) Hindt said.” The story is about the struggles of a black girl in a racist environment (wouldn’t this be considered anti-racist). They can basically just ban whatever book they want.The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark

Show More
Related

  • Vonnegut's Argument Against Banning Books

    580 Words  | 2 Pages

    When authors write books, the books are meant to be read not banned. Authors write books to be read, so when schools and other facilities are banning books it’s taking away the author’s right. In the letter, I am Very Real written by author Kurt Vonnegut, he states “If you were to bother to read my books, to behave as educated persons would, you would learn that they are not sexy, and do not argue in favor of wildness of any kind. They beg that people be kinder and more responsible than they often are.” This excerpt from the text states that the author doesn’t write books to teach cruel things. Vonnegut writes books in a kind manner with the idea that people become more

    Read More

  • Why Should Huck Finn Be Banned

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Library has no right to ban Huck Finn on these grounds. The reason that books should be banned is to protect the innocence of young readers and to keep them from reading something inappropriate for their age. The reasons that they (the committee) gave for banning Huck Finn are unsatisfactory and are not valid reasons to ban a book. Now, it is true that for most younger readers the elaborate satire and criticisms of the American culture in Huck Finn are lost, but that is no reason to ban it, it is simply a statement that some will understand the deeper meaning of the book, while for others, it will be lost.

    Read More

  • Should Huck Finn Be Banned Essay

    941 Words  | 2 Pages

    The act of banning something is an aggressive measure. However, this being said whether to ban Mark Twains The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has long been debated. While some say that the book is offensive and disrespectful, others claim it to be a valuable learning lesson. Because of its beneficial lessons, its way of shocking the reader, its reputation as being one of the best novels in american history along with other controversial books being allowed in high schools, The Adventure’s of Huckleberry Finn should be read by every High School across the country.

    Read More

  • The Catcher in the Rye Should Be Banned

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    Catcher In The Rye was written in 1951 and for this time period, the book’s content was extremely ahead of its time. Its frequent foul language and sex-driven themes led it to be banned by several school systems across the country since its release.

    Read More

  • Should The Great Gatsby Be Banned

    1103 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the thought that someone can be hurt by reading a book, people will try to challenge and ban them. To ban a book is to have it restricted from a certain age or audience. Banning and challenging books is trying to keep a certain book away from an audience due to sexual content, going against religious beliefs, language and vulgarity, violence, drugs, self-harm, racism, occult/satanic views, promoting gangs, and going against community standards. An argument from someone who believes books should not be banned is that it is important for the age group to learn about certain content and material as they grow up. Due to controversial content, the novel The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald should be banned.

    Read More

  • Huck Finn is NOT a Racist Novel

    975 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...If Huck Finn is to be banned in schools on the grounds that it is “racist,” then we should not be assigned any books. The Chocolate War should be banned because it uses offensive language and contains sexual content not suitable for junior high students; Julie of the Wolves should as well, because it contains violence, offensive language, and sexual content; Harry Potter, because it contradicts Christianity and endorses the occult, and And Then There Were None, whose ghastly murder techniques were quite disturbing to me as a 14-year-old. Furthermore, Poe’s morbid and violent works should be excommunicated because their content is unsuitable for “fragile minds.” In reality, should any of these books be banned? No. Maturity, sensitivity, and understanding are all that is needed to effectively teach to the children of tomorrow what is conveyed through these masterpieces.

    Read More

  • Banning Books in Schools

    973 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...etter than ignorance. Book censorship should not limit the amount of knowledge a child can receive, instead, books should be used to benefit children in their education and future career.

    Read More

  • To Kill A Mockingbird Should Not Be Banned Essay

    571 Words  | 2 Pages

    As you can now see “To Kill A Mockingbird” should not be be banned because it tells an important fictional story about America's past. This book does contain rape, violence, and foul language. The author is keeping true to the time period. Also these kind of things are seen in the world on a daily basis. Us children should not be sheltered from these kind of serious

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Of Banning Books

    692 Words  | 2 Pages

    People should be allowed to read whatever they want to read, even if it is a touchy subject to someone else. Although some people mainly believe in the banning of books due to explicit content, it actually causes a negative effect on people and children. Not only does it take away the people’s first amendment rights, but it also shelters children from real life situations that might affect their future. Banning books is unconstitutional and shelters children.

    Read More

  • The Effects of Censorship on Experienced High School English Teachers

    1183 Words  | 3 Pages

    When a book is banned, reasoning should be backed up with many facts and teachers should be able to agree or disagree. Teachers are the ones who have graduated from colleges and have earned this right. Though the opinions of parents matter, their opinion does not necessarily take into account all that the book has to give. Parents may not see the potential of the book as a whole. They may just see the racist language or cruel behavior in a book. What their opinions are mostly based on is the information that will keep everyone the most comfortable instead of the importance behind the basics for students to learn (Hills). Some books may include opposing ideas like this, but that does not mean that they do not have something to teach us. Many teachers take it on themselves to determine what is appropriate. They take on a certain level of self-imposed censorship to make sure that they are teaching appropriate material. Along with this, books being bought with school funds have to go through a process of approval (Zimmerman). This should eliminate any problem areas that parents may have. Besides just having the school board approving the books, many teachers have the same basic outline of what a book should include and be like. They ag...

    Read More

  • Banned Books

    1205 Words  | 3 Pages

    Every year in the United States we have books being banned and challenged by many people who do not like the contents of books. When researching for this argument essay I found an article written by Rebecca Hagelin. Rebecca Hagelin is the author of Home Invasion: Protecting Your Family in a Culture That’s Gone Stark Raving Mad and the vice president of communications and marketing at the Heritage Foundation (Lankford).

    Read More

  • Censorship Debate: The Controversy around 'Brave New World'

    2361 Words  | 5 Pages

    But why? After all the book is a satire and you would think people would realize that pretty early on. However, since they didn't, or haven't they find many reasons to have the book banned, such as drugs, sex, and violence, as well as sexism and racism. In the beginning of the book we are introduced to a class of students touring the facility that grows children, we learn about how much has changed in this world compared to our own, eventually we get to a group of children playing a game called "hunt the zipper" in which the children run around and "hunt the zipper" (you can figure out what that means) And even later we hear of the children learning about sex, a worker who is explaining all that the children have done that day to the director say, "We had Elementary Sex for the first forty minutes," she answered. "But now it's switched over to Elementary Class Consciousness." The Director walked slowly down the long line of cots. Rosy and relaxed with sleep, eighty little boys and girls lay softly breathing." (Huxley) From both of these examples it could be pretty obvious why someone would want to ban the book's, but if we're being honest, there's probably more if this book is going to be banned so frequently. What could there possibly be in this book that would make parents wish to remove this book/ It has to be something that parents are

    Read More

  • The Catcher In the Rye Should Not be Banned

    793 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Catcher in the Rye Should Not be Banned. & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Since its publication in 1951, The Catcher In the Rye, written by J.D. Salinger has served as a conflagration for debate and extreme controversy. Although the novel has been the target of scornful criticism, it has also been the topic of wide discussion. The novel portrays the life of sixteen year old, Holden Caufield. Currently in psychiatric care, Holden recalls what happened to him last Christmas.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Lovely Bones By Alice Sebold Books

    2019 Words  | 5 Pages

    There are multiple reasons why a book can be banned or challenged. Book banning causes the removal of materials in schools and libraries due to “inappropriate” content. The Lovely Bones, by Alice Sebold, was banned due to sexual content and language.

    Read More

  • Banning Books In Schools

    1650 Words  | 4 Pages

    “I believe that books challenge and interrogate. They give us windows into the lives of others and give us mirrors so that we can better see ourselves. Ultimately if you have a worldview that can be undone by a novel, let me submit that the problem is not with the novel.” This quote was said by John Greene, and everything he said is completely true. By banning books, schools are teaching young children that there is no diversity in the world and that the world they know is the world everyone knows. When schools promote these small worldviews, that is when prejudice and discrimination grow and fester. The children begin to think that since a book is banned it must be wrong, but in reality, it’s not wrong, it’s just different. Like John Greene said, if someone has a worldview that is so small that they feel the need to ban a book because something in the book is different than the life they’ve experienced, then the problem is most definitely not with the book, it is with the person. Schools should not ban books because it plants the seed of discrimination in children and halts the progression of society.

    Read More

More about Hook Sentence: Should Books Be Banned

Open Document