Hiroshima And Nagasaki: Was It Necessary?

1180 Words3 Pages

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Was it necessary?
In early August of 1945, the U.S dropped an American B-29 bomber over the Japanese city, Hiroshima. The explosion wiped out 90 percent of the city and immediately killed 80,000 people; tens of thousands more would later die of radiation exposure. Three, days later the US dropped another bomb over the city of Nagasaki, killing an estimated 40,000 people. Today, the question is, was it worth it to wipe out around 120,000 people? Yes, in fact it was, this was about protecting the US people, not the Japanese, in war, protect your people and defend them, not your enemies. Japan were our enemy and, they would not surrender under our circumstances. The US needed to do something about it. Although, there …show more content…

In the early morning on December 7, 1941, Pearl Harbor, a naval base in Honolulu, Hawaii was attacked by Japanese fighter planes. The devastating attack lasted two hours, and they managed to kill more than 2,000 soldiers. The day after the assault, President Franklin D. Roosevelt asked Congress to declare war on Japan; Congress approved his declaration with just one dissenting vote. The attack on Pearl Harbor was brought into the decision making when the US had to make a tough decision; to drop it and devastate Japan. According to atomcentral.com “Since 1941, when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, the forces of the United States and her allies had been at war with Japan. The combined land, sea and air forces of the Allies fought back against Japan until only the Japanese homeland remained in Japanese control. On July 26, Truman issued the Potsdam Declaration, which called for Japan's unconditional surrender and listed peace terms. He had already been informed of the successful detonation of the first atomic bomb at Alamogordo, New Mexico, ten days earlier. The attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki can be considered as “payback” from the attack on Pearl Harbor in

Open Document