Hippocrates Versus Galen

1026 Words3 Pages

A world without Hippocrates and Galen would likely be a world without the modern medical practices used today. Hippocrates being often regarded as the father of medicine, and Galen being arguably one of the most influential doctors to the current practice of medicine; their combined writings played a large role into the progression of medicine. The majority of Galen’s medical knowledge stemmed Hippocrates’ works, as he claimed to be a strong believer in Hippocratic humoralism. Despite the fact that there are clear similarities and of overlap between the methods used by these men, there are also several prominent characteristics that each hold which separate them as well. This statement is supported when analyzing the works of each individual. …show more content…

Both physicians clearly state the importance of foretelling the outcome of a patient's ailment, as well as that the best way in which to do so is by looking at the appearance and symptoms of the patient, as well as the humors being discharged. For example, Hippocrates writes on the dangers of phlegm being expelled from the lungs; stating that it is better if it occurs quickly after the lungs are affected, yet it is a more fatal sign if it occurs later after pain in the lungs begins and is not smooth in consistency (Prognosis, pp. 119). Galen speaks similarly on a disease in the lungs declaring that if noxious humors are expelled along with bronchial cartilage, it is likely that a large ulceration is present, which may lead to putrefaction of the lungs and may ultimately be fatal (Galen on the Affected Parts, pp. 16). Both works include the mentionings of Hippocratic humoralism to identify a prognosis of a patient. That being said, Galen’s prognosis comes with a thorough explanation as to what is occurring within the patient's body, identifying both organs and specifying the cause of the imbalance being due to the ulceration, which will likely lead to death. Galen clarifies that unlike Hippocratic humoralism, which almost never mentions anatomical structures within the body, a physician should be familiar with the activities and normal functions of organs in order to make an accurate prognosis (Galen on the Affected Parts, pp. 16). The idea of prognosis to Hippocratics and Galen are overall quite similar, yet it is in Galen’s writings a different, more structure based conclusion is made which strays from earlier

Open Document