High Stakes Testing Argument

786 Words2 Pages

As time has passed high-stakes and standardized testing have become the backbone for the United States educational system. This type of testing is flawed in many ways and has diminishing returns at the cost of a students sanity, time, and overall knowledge of a subject. For these reasons, high-stakes testing should be stopped and replaced with something more realistic for all students to achieve. We all know taking high-stakes tests are stressful but for a portion of students it makes them physically and mentally weakened, “Children are pressured to not only demonstrate their knowledge but to represent the effectiveness of their teachers and their schools. Teachers are reporting children throwing up, losing control of their bowels, and increased commitments for psychiatric and anxiety issues.” The evidence comes from real teachers that have to help these students through testing. An example like this clearly shows that these tests damage students, either mentally or physically which is never good for anyone. In light …show more content…

“There’s less time for learning with testing and test prep (for example, Pittsburgh students now take 20-25, or more, high-stakes tests a year, with new tests this year in art and music)” (Supovitz line 43). With some of these tests taking an entire class period or more to complete these tests dig into time reserved for introducing new topics or mastering old ones. That leads to teachers not reaching a certain spot in the curriculum and may lead to school being extended, and in college now classes, the students may not get the college credits. Due to these glaring issues, high-stakes testing should be replaced with something more student (and teacher) friendly that doesn’t take up valuable time in the classroom, which should be spent on furthering the students

Open Document