Henrietta Lacks Compensation

538 Words2 Pages

She died in 1951, and yet she is still alive. Literally, Henrietta Lacks has been unwittingly immortalized through her cells (HeLa) which have multiplied in laboratories throughout the world. The 2010 bestseller The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks also breathed life to the controversy surrounding her cells: should the Lacks family receive monetary compensation for HeLa’s immense contribution to science and medicine? That answer is a resolute no. On the concept of feasibility, disputes regarding practicality make reparation impossible. The fundamental definition of “family” yields the question of deciding which members of the Lacks family should be eligible for remuneration. Would compensation conclude with Lacks’s immediate kin or expand to extended family? Her children Lawrence Lacks, Sonny Lacks, and Zakariyya Bari Abdul Rahman would undoubtedly receive restitution, but the passing of daughters Elsie Lacks and Deborah Lacks complicate the case for direct descendants. Hence, no just method exists to determine which relatives would qualify for restitutions. Additionally another hindrance to compensation arises: who should be held accountable for repaying the Lacks family? The default culprit Johns Hopkins merely freely distributed HeLa to other laboratories, never garnering any profit from the cells. Hundred of research institutions across the globe have received samples of HeLa; thus, tracking down each individual laboratory would be next to impossible. Even if that feat was feasible, what monetary value should be compensated? No single individual or organization has the authority to dictate an appropriate amount that can simultaneously satisfy both family and compensator as well as solve the ethical

Open Document