Hegel And The Invisible Man Analysis

533 Words2 Pages

A famed philosopher, Hegel, emphasizes that self-consciousness is attained by being recognized by another conscious being. When these two beings collide, one will be a Master and the other would be a Bondsman, after fighting in a life-or-death struggle to prove dominance over the other. This relationship is said to be fluid. This idea can be found in Ellison’s the invisible man where he gives the story of himself relating to the black experience in the 1950s. Most importantly, when he fought a white man in the alley, and with the Light & Power Company. In the story, black people are not just downed by white people to mere objects as Hegel mentions, they merely do not exist. In the first conflict of the story, Ellison describes his fight with a white man. In contrast with Hegel, the white man is supposed to be the Master, because the city was mainly white, and the Bondsman is Ellison’s character. The two characters fight and Ellison beats up the white man without him fighting …show more content…

This change is not necessarily dramatic, could be from either end of the relationship. Between the lines of Hegel’s opinion, it can be inferred that being a slave is sometimes better than being the Master. In the Master’s position, he gained mastery, but lost a challenge in the Bondsman which builds up to boredom and loss of recognition. Whereas the Bondsman strives to be recognized as a conscious, which keeps the Bondsman occupied and not get bored. This can also be recognized in the Invisible Man, where Ellison accepts being invisible, and favors the perks of being invisible. In addition, fear and creativity are lacked in the Master rank, which forces the Slave to acquire recognition without the help of the other. Resulting in the possibility that the Bondsman would have the potential to challenge the Master, and win the fight. Knowing the feeling of being a Slave, the Bondsman will consider the Master to be an

Open Document