Hedda Gabler Essay

1238 Words3 Pages

In the late 19th century, women were expected to be pious and pure, restrained as homebound mothers in their private sphere (Gordon 26). Hedda Gabler, a play by Henrik Ibsen, explores the concept of femininity through Hedda Tesman and Thea Elvsted, two women searching for an identity and purpose in life. In Ibsen’s modern drama, Thea serves as a foil to Hedda. Their juxtaposed external characteristics and emotional interactions portray how Thea Elvsted fits into gender norms more so than Hedda Gabler.
One significant difference between Hedda and Thea is the contrasting hair types of the two women. Hedda’s hair is depicted as average and normal, an “agreeable medium brown, but not particularly abundant” (Ibsen 7). Thea’s is sharply different, …show more content…

Similarly to her hair, Hedda is emotionally barren, devoid of maternal loving. The perfect picture of a woman in Ibsen’s time was motherly and nurturing, and once again, Hedda fails to meet Thea’s standards. Throughout the play, comments such as George Tesman mentioning Hedda has “filled out” hint at her pregnancy (9). Hedda reacts in a harsh tone, saying he “can’t see anything”, completely ignoring the implications of Tesman’s statement (9). In this manner, she rejects motherhood. From the exposition, Hedda complains about “a whole flood of sunshine”, presenting her dislike for symbols of life (8). Thea is the polar opposite, sending the Tesman's a bouquet of flowers, a symbol of vivacity and birth. This distinction between Hedda’s dislike of nature and Thea’s affinity for it represents the distinction in their motherly characteristics. Furthermore, though Thea has no children of her own and Hedda is pregnant, Eilert’s manuscript serves as a symbolic child in Ibsen’s play. Hedda doesn’t fit the caregiver archetype, saying she doesn’t “care about that” manuscript, showing no love towards Eilert’s life and blood (49). Thea conversely protects and loves the manuscript, putting in countless hours to perfect the document. Thea expresses extreme sadness when Eilert’s manuscript is thought to be lost, comparing it to the killing of “a little child” (57). Hedda is the converse, deriving …show more content…

As mentioned previously, women were to sit and look pretty like wallflowers. Though neither woman fully fits this stereotypical image, Thea exhibits more courage and character than Hedda. Thea, in her loveless marriage, was seen as mere “useful property” (17). She runs away from this situation, taking control of her life, in a path to freedom which Hedda never accomplishes. Hedda wants to “control a human destiny” but this desire displays that she has no power: neither over herself, nor over her husband (45). Stranded in a loveless marriage, Hedda marries simply because George Tesman does more than “other adorers were prepared to do” (28). While Hedda’s marriage represents a fall in class, Thea’s marriage helps her rise in status. Though Thea and Hedda face similar dilemmas in finding a marital partner, they have different levels of courage. Whereas Thea, a dynamic and three-dimensional character, takes charge of her existence, Hedda deals with her problems in a spineless manner, using jealousy and manipulation. In Eilert’s words, Thea is “so brave” (41) whereas Hedda is a “coward at heart” (40). Eilert’s opinion is especially significant since both of the women must focus their livelihoods around men, finding a purpose through the dominant sex in society. However, their dealings with men are not the only factor that depict the juxtaposed nature of their two characters. Thea has “done

Open Document