Heart Of Darkness Research Paper

2006 Words5 Pages

In the novella, Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad states how, "I don't like work--no man does--but I like what is in the work--the chance to find yourself. Your own reality--for yourself not for others--what no other man can ever know. They can only see the mere show, and never can tell what it really means." What the author is trying to say is that people can only see the surface, however, the man putting forth the work see's the bigger picture and truly grasps the concept of his work. The theme of perception of reality is seen throughout Joseph Conrad's novella, Heart of Darkness, where, our main protagonist, Marlow ventures out to the Congo River Basin of Africa in search for a man named Kurtz. As the story progresses, Marlow loses his sense …show more content…

This “heart of darkness” is represented by the very continent of Africa itself. As Marlow and his crew venture deeper into the continent by using the Congo River, this shows how the men are venturing into the darker and more evil parts of man. When Marlow and his crew are getting close to the Inner Station, they are attacked by the natives’ with arrows. During the attack, Marlow simply throws his shoes off the boat. At first glance, this is seen as odd and pointless, however, this action does have a meaning. Since shoes represent modern and civilized societies, taking off the shoes and walking barefoot represents traditional or “savage” behavior. Overall, this action shows how Marlow is, “penetrating deeper and deeper into the heart of darkness” (Pg. 44) and how he is losing his sense of civilization. After this, Marlow and his crew finally reach the Inner Station. At this point, the men have reached the deepest and darkest part of the heart. The men have witnessed the savage and mad behavior of Kurtz, where they see African heads’ stuck onto spikes. Even after all this, Marlow sides with Kurtz and turns his back on the Manager and the rest of the crew. The reason for this is Marlow understands Kurtz’s deepest self-awareness and applies it to himself. Henceforth, Marlow sees his own potential corruption mirrors Kurtz’s current corruption. If he killed Kurtz or sided with the Manager, he would be betraying himself. This clearly shows that Marlow has lost his own sense of judgement due to the fact that he sides with a psychopath who inflicted horror and fear into the hearts of the natives’. Finally, after his adventures within the Congo, he travels to speak with Kurtz’s Intended. Before meeting her, Marlow says how, “I don't know. I can't tell. But I went” (Pg. 91). Marlow does not know if he should tell her the true atrocities her

Open Document