Hayden's Talk Analysis

535 Words2 Pages

#context, #emotionalpersuasion, #confidence, #perspective About two weeks ago, I went to a discussion with General Michael Hayden at the Commonwealth Club. Hayden is the only person to have served as a director of both the CIA and the NSA. The talk he gave was about “American intelligence in an age of terror,” specifically discussing portions of his new book, which bears the same name. For sake of our discussion, we will focus on only one primary facet of Hayden’s talk--how we should view the role the intelligence community plays in everyday life. One of the first aspects in addressing this was a distinction Hayden made between normal national operations and operations concerning national security. Of course, the question was asked whether the NSA really could listen to our phone calls. Hayden said this was not a reality, but that the NSA does in fact collect metadata (i.e., phone number, duration of call, time of call) on certain selected calls. This statement led into the broader conversation concerning extent of privacy as a freedom. This is where Hayden made the distinction. He said that if …show more content…

Additionally, Hayden related an anecdote about how he would go to his grandchildren’s school or sports events and see employees of these agencies among the crowd of parents and relatives. He said this was proof more than anything--that you could have someone as a friend and have your children play with his or her children, causing direct interactions with this person, and then unwittingly be disgusted by the same person (e.g., a CIA employee) because of false portrayals in the media. Hayden’s point can be summarized by the old adage: “Don’t judge a book by its cover.” This refers to both the depiction of intelligence employees, as well as the people we know and interact with every

Open Document