Hate Speech On The Internet Should Be Regulated Analysis

558 Words2 Pages

Freedom of speech is one of the most precious rights and every citizen deserves it in every country. This right gives people the opportunity to speak their mind. Freedom of speech is guaranteed under the constitution in many countries including America. However, in some countries freedom of speech seems never exist. Ethiopia is one example of those counties. According to Opposing Viewpoints in Context article “Freedom of Speech,” explains free speech is part of the foundation of America. Free speech challenges year to year in different countries. Ronald Eissens in her article “Hate Speech On the Internet should Be Regulated” states that “hate speech is one of the reasons for many negative results in human life.” Freedom of speech and hate speech are two different things and Ethiopia is an example of this. In Ethiopia, social media and the internet are controlled by government and people could not do nothing about it. When their citizens try to protest, and demonstrate in the press against the government, they are thrown in jail, tortured or killed. Many journalists are still in jail just because they express their feeling about the government. Government still insists that by his own media there is a freedom of speech in Ethiopia. The government ignores citizens’ rights regarding to stay in power. …show more content…

Hate speech has a power to drive people mad. Eissens in the article “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Be Regulated” details that “after all, Auschwitz was consequence of hate speech that built out in words. Words that were also at the roots of the Rwandan genocide, the Balkan war and other massacres.”. No hate speech is such an important movement. Hate speech affects people lives performance. The best way to keep people respectful each other is by strictly limit hate speech by law, but allow very lively debate their

Open Document