Cloth and wire monkey experiment
In this experiment a psychologist named Harry Harlow had an idea about the effects and damages of love and conducted them in the 1960’s. Harlow demonstrated the powerful effects of love. His experiments were often inhumane and just cruel. But they uncovered many truths and facts that have heavily influenced our understanding of child development. Harlow’s experiment involved giving young monkeys a choice between two different "mothers." One was made of soft terrycloth, but provided no food. The other was made of wire, but provided nourishment from an attached baby bottle. Harlow removed young monkeys from their natural mothers a few hours after birth and left them to be raised by the wire and terrycloth mothers. The experiment demonstrated that the baby monkeys spent significantly more time with their cloth mother than with their wire mother. Basically the infant monkeys went to the wire mother only for food,but spent most of their time with the comforting terry cloth mother. The monkey would turn the the terry cloth mother as a security blanket. In the end of the experiment when the mothers were removed from the room, the effects were substantial. The young monkeys no longer had a security blanket or anything to comfort it for exploration and would often freeze up, rock, scream, and cry.
…show more content…
While many experts of the time didn’t really care to focus on the importance of parental love and affection, Harlow’s experiments offered vital proof that love is in fact needed for a child's well being. Additional experiments Harlow conducted actually revealed the long-term devastation caused by deprivation, leading to profound psychological and emotional distress and even
During the twentieth century, Harry Harlow performed one of the most controversial experiments that led to a scientific breakthrough concerning the parent-child relationship. It paved the way for understanding terms such as secure, insecure, ambivalent, and disorganized relationships (Bernstein, 2014, 364). During the course of this study, Harlow separated baby monkeys from their birth mothers and isolated them in frightening environments. According to the video “H.H. Overview”, this proved the monkey’s preference for a comforting mother versus a nutritional one. However, this raises the question: can his experiments be deemed ethical, or did his scientific inquiry overstep boundaries?
Both authors provide a inspiring job of giving an explanation as to why ‘The interaction of biological variables with environment variables results in pro-social or antisocial outcomes.’ (Karr-Morse. Wiley, 1999) There are various examples of this interaction in every chaper of the book relating in very different scenarios. This then makes the reader quickly take that this is the important essential that needs to be made that ‘children will reflect what they have taken biologically and socially.’ Karr-Morse. Wiley, 1998) This book does an amazing job of assessing an amount of issues which are related to child abuse and neglect which include for example drugs being used whilst the child is in the womb, the relationship between the child and parent; whether there is enough interaction, any influence of an primary
According to Klaus and Kennell, there are specific events, including skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant that must occur directly following the birth of a primate infant. This maximizes the chances of survival for the newborn not only because their mother is a source of food, but also because they will learn the culture they need to be successful in their environment. In the study, Klaus and Kennell test how much time a baby spends crying when they are separated from their mother. They concluded the increased time in babies that were separated was due to the anxiety that separation caused. The difficulty in this is that the cause of the baby’s distress is subjective. Also the notion of critical period proposed that the bonds and lessons taught during that time could not be developed later.
Fox (1995) poses that it is possible that early childhood attachment does not influence adults’ minds relative to attachment. He also is hesitant to agree that parental sensitivity is a valuable aspect that is potentially “transmitted” to offspring.
Infant Children most always feels very secure with their mother or guardian. When carrying for a child you always have to give them their basic requirements, but you also have to show them love and affection. Love and affection can have more affect on a child than just giving them basic needs. In my psychology class, we talked about a psychologist named Harry F. Harlow. He performed an experiment at the University of Wisconsin which was on the mother/ child bond with monkeys. I will review some of that experiment and explain how this experiment was very true within my life.
Maternal and paternal systems enrich a child and contribute extensively to the child’s emotional well-being. There is a large body of research that links early life experiences and relationships as being crucial to our lifelong capacity to engage in healthy relationships, enjoy basic physical health and avoid mental health risks.
In conclusion, mother-infant attachment paves the way for adult social relationships as supported by Mary Ainsworth’s Strange Situation experiment and its follow-up, Bowlby’s 44 Thieves study, and Henry Harlow’s classic experiment with the monkeys. Furthermore, strong secure attachments breed healthy social relationships, while insecure attachments lead to difficult social and emotional issues. The best way to prevent insecure attachments is by creating that strong mother-infant bond in the first year of life. It is crucial for potential parents to be prepared emotionally, economically, and socially for a new infant. As the acorn has the potential to become an oak with the right conditions and environment, an infant also has the potential to become a successful adult with a supportive, healthy, environment.
Harlow’s experiment shows the connection of mother and child using monkeys. From this experiment you can see that withdrawal or removal can cause depression in the rhesus monkeys. Harlow further relates that to children and their mothers. Seeing that there was too much maternal contact he notes that over attachment can cause severe depression.
Research in any given area can yield many different results despite having the same aim. Varying results of separate studies may be due to different circumstances and conditions that surround them. Both Bigelow and La Gaipa and Corsaro differed in their conclusions (Brownlow, 2012). However, both had a similar aim in as much as they wanted to research how children understood friendship. By contrast, how and whether previous studies influenced them differed. The work of Bigelow and La Gaipa was not rooted in any background or tradition of research. They carried out their work in 1975 and at that time most studies about children had centred on attraction. Therefore, the work that they did was among the first of its kind. In addition to being an original piece of research, it also had validity because subsequent individuals carried out similar work. One such person was William Damon with the research he did in 1977 (Brownlow, 2012). Damon was also studying children’s friendships and as a conseq...
According to the American Psychological Society, there is evidence that early mother-child bonding results in positive
By choosing to lover her child, the mother acknowledges that she doesn’t feel as if she is obligated to do so because she wants to love him or her and is prepared for the challenges that await her. Thoma Oord writes in his article “The Love Racket: Defining Love and Agape for the Love–and–Science Research Program” that the definition of love refers to the “promotion of well being of all others in an enduring, intense, effective, and pure manner” meaning that when a person loves someone, they will try to do whatever they can to their beloved’s benefit (922). The child is benefited in many ways when the mother chooses to love him or her, for example, the child’s anxiety levels and sense of fear are lowered because they have the security of the bond they possess with their mother (Tarlaci 745). In his article, “Unmasking the Neurology of Love,” Robert Weiss explains that love is a “goal-orientated motivation state rather than a specific emotion” which arises the possibility of a mother “falling out of love” with her child if neither feelings or goals are present. Tarlaci observed an experiment conducted by A. Bartels and S. Zeki in which they compared the brain activity of both a mother looking at a picture of her child to a lover looking at a picture of their beloved. In the experiment it was discovered that “just about the same regions of the brain showed activity in the same two groups except for one” the PACG, which has been confirmed to be “specific to a mother’s love” (Tarlaci 747). So the chances of a mother falling out of love with her child are there, but are different from that of a lover due to the areas of the brain involved. Therefore, explaining the bond between a mother and child as something that forms when a mother chooses to love him or her implies a greater sense of willingness and
John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth studied imprinting and developed the attachment theory. He rejected ...
If a parent has a negative emotion and negative reactions to children’s expression of emotion, it will cause children to also have negative emotions and low social competence. It states, “children reared in families in which emotions, particularly negative emotions are not discussed freely may be deprived of information about emotions and their regulation and may conclude that emotions should not be expressed” (Eisenberg 255). Children will grow with a disadvantage in terms of their emotional and social competence. These kids will lack emotion because it was not discussed when they were younger and they will not know how to express how they truly feel since they were deprived. In the article “The Lifelong Impact of Childhood Experiences: A Population Health Perspective” it discusses that early childhood experiences have a powerful effect on one’s life. It also focuses on different statuses of the family as a child and that can also have an effect on how a parent is raising their child. It states “Across North America approximately 50 percent of single parent families live in poverty, more than twice as many as Western Europe”(Hertzman
As children, we depend greatly on our parents to satisfy our basic needs, for guidance, nurturance and for help in shaping our emotions, behaviors and relationships. For children, the family is a highly valued context for understanding and interpreting their development as individuals. As Bjorklund and Pelligrini (2001) have asserted, we are a “slow-developing, big-brained species”, the relatively large size of our brains demands a prolonged period of immaturity, therefore requiring a great deal of support and nurturance from parents (DeLoache, J., Eisenberg, N., Siegler, R. 2011). However, an adaptive consequence to this extended immaturity is our high level of neural plasticity and our ability to learn from experience. Growing up in a stable environment can undoubtedly reap successful development for children on many levels, just as living in an unstable environment will certainly allow for undesirable consequences. Despite great individual differences, research from psychologists such as Erik Erikson and Sigmund Freud, among others allows us to organize and understand the affects of long lasting parental conflict on child development and family. Research has allowed a strong shot at understanding child development, allowing parental conflict to be observed and connected with the development of children across many aspects. It is largely the differences between socioeconomic status, culture, race, gender and level of conflict, support and resiliency, which directly affect children and other relatives over time.
Filial imprinting is a phenomenon whereby the young quickly learn to recognize their parents thereby following them everywhere, keeping proximity to them and avoiding contact with any other but close family. Imprinting takes place during a critical period immediately following birth. In 1950, Harry Harlow conducted experiments with rhesus monkeys. He set monkeys up with "mothers" made of cloth, wire frame mothers, and some had no mothers at all. In the experiments, the monkeys obviously showed a strong preference for the wire monkeys and in all cases, they clung to whatever mother they had. Post maturation, the monkeys would pull their hair, rock back and forth, and were not able to mate. Monkeys have a similar physiology to humans and would more than likely show similar outcomes. People raised without their mother have tendency to be more violent. Without a model of maternal behavior, children will not grow up with natural maternal "instincts." Babies and mothers practice synchrony, by mimicking one another. Parents more often abuse their adopted children than natural birth children. This is likely because the parents do not have the hormones released at birth-which form loving attachments.