Hammer Vs Dagenhart Case Study

534 Words2 Pages

The case of Hammer v. Dagenhart has its roots steeped in the U.S. industrial revolution, and its heavy use of child labor. Children worked in textile mills, cotton mills, and even mines to help provide for their families, these young children suffered three times as many injuries as their adult counter parts. They earned much less than adults and often worked sixty to seventy hour weeks, because of this they were unable to attend schools or simply enjoy their childhood. It wasn’t until around the year 1902 that committees and groups started forming to limit and ultimately end the use of child labor. In response to groups like the National Child Labor Committee, state legislatures tried to place restrictions on the child’s age and the hours that they worked. These were, unfortunately, wildly ineffective, manufactures were quick to complain about the unfairness of having to compete against those other manufactures whose production numbers weren’t hampered by child labor laws. Finally in order to try and but more lasting and far reaching restrictions on the use of child labor the Keating-Owen Child Labor Act of 1916 was proposed to Congress by Edward Keating and Robert Latham Owen. …show more content…

The act also proposed that children under the age of 16 should only work between the hours of 6am and 7pm, and that those would be restricted to no more than eight hours a day, at six days a week. In order to try and enforce the act it was decided that the Secretary of Labor would have people inspect different places of work to ensure that they were with in compliance, those that weren’t faced a fine and/or

More about Hammer Vs Dagenhart Case Study

Open Document