Hamlet and the Issue of Revenge in William Shakespeare's Play

1505 Words4 Pages

Hamlet and the Issue of Revenge in William Shakespeare's Play

The question of why Hamlet does not immediately avenge his father's

death is perhaps one of the most perplexing problems faced by an

audience. Each generation of viewers has come up with it's own

explanation, and it has now become the most widely known critical

problem in Shakespearean studies. A rather simplistic, yet valid

standpoint to take on this problem is that it was essential to the

tragedy's narrative progression. As Hanmer said "had he gone naturally

to work, there would have been an end to our play!". Shakespeare,

then, is faced with a problem - Hamlet must delay his revenge, and he

has to come up with reasons why. The ingenuity of his solutions in

depicting this complex and troubled man has given us an insight into

the human condition of relevance to each age. Since we are certainly

left in no doubt of the intricacy of Hamlet's character, it would

therefore seem that Shakespeare is exploring a diversity of reasons as

to why the Prince of Denmark delays his revenge.

Hamlet's delay begins as he recognises that first he must determine

the ghost's true nature. Upon doubting the authenticity of its form he

questions it's intent with, "Bring with thee airs from heaven or

blasts from hell?". Despite the ghost's pending claim of "I am thy

father's spirit", Hamlet still seems to be unconvinced, thus

presenting Shakespeare with a primary ingredient for delay.

As way of detecting the truth, the Prince decides to put on a play,

and have it performed almost as a re-enactment of the ghosts tale. The

play, Hamlet claims "is the image of a murder done in Vienna", the

...

... middle of paper ...

... moral conscience and his insecurities when looking at superior warrior

types meant he did not have the 'will' to commit this vengeance. His

reflective personality delayed his revenge; his constant analytical

thinking paralysed him, and when he did actually fulfil his task it

was on pure instinct when he did not have time to think. This final

point perhaps suggests that overall it was Hamlet's personal

shortcomings that led to his delay. The fight with his moral

conscience, his belief in restraint over passion all contributed to

his major hesitation. However, overall it was down to Hamlet's

substantial indifference to a typical 'revenge hero'. Bloodthirsty,

passionate and fiery are qualities that Hamlet certainly did lack.

Rather he took the more passive, sly approach which would inevitably

lead to a significant delay.

More about Hamlet and the Issue of Revenge in William Shakespeare's Play

Open Document