Hamitic Myth

921 Words2 Pages

The Hamitic myth is a theory that arose from the Talmudic stories of descendance, and claims that the people in Africa are the descendents of Ham, the cursed son of Noah. In short, this myth serves as a justification for the mistreatment of Africans, and undermined the study of Africa and its people, as it creates a skewed lense through which all other information learned about Africa would be learned: that somehow Africa and its people are inferior.
Around the sixth century AD stories about descendance were recorded in the Babylonian Talmud, a collection of Jewish stories and oral traditions. One of which revolved around a story about Noah and his sons. The story goes that Noah drank excessively one day and was lying out naked for all to see. His son Ham saw his father in this state, and rather than cover him, informs his brothers so that they too can laugh at their father. When Noah awoke and realized what had happened, he curses Ham’s descendents to be born black, enslaved, and engage in unethical behavior.
Over the years, the myth had to be changed, as holes in the theory emerged. In the 17th century, scientists determined that environmental factors influenced skin color, and that the closer humans are to the direct rays of the sun felt at the …show more content…

The advanced ironwork, the irrigation systems, and complex political systems constructed by Africans were said to have been brought by pastoral Hamites, or early Europeans. Similarly, the powerful civilization of Egypt, Ethiopia, Nubia, and other smaller groups west of the oasis of Ammon were thought by followers of the Hamitic myth to be attributed to an Arian colony from India that settled in the upper part of the Nile valley. There was little evidence for these claims, and yet they persisted because of the schema created to justify the oppression of

Open Document