Hafren Bum Essay

1122 Words3 Pages

Marketing analysis: Hafren Baum retails luxury home furniture which makes the demand for it being cyclical. Over the last two years from 1994 to 1995 the net sales for Hafren Baum have fallen by 21.05% and 1.24% respectively. There are number of factors which have caused this change. According to German economic statistics, we can see that the economy slowed down which forced retailers to reduce their prices to keep the old demand. Despite the fact that Hafren Baum constructed 3 more outlets in the expectation of higher sales volume their sales went down by almost 18% which seems to be the result of boom turning to bust in 1993. Later in 1995, the economy started recovering, but the sales for small retailers like Hafren kept declining. The …show more content…

Ratio analysis of Hafren Baum are the evidence for the lack of efficiency in 1994 and 1995. First, the total asset turnover implies that the firm is investing high as compared to its sales growth. However, in 1994 Hafren Baum constructed 3 addition outlets in suburbs which could be the main reason for short TAT from 2.1 which was before expansion to 1.5 of TAT after expansion. Secondly, the fixed asset turnover for Hafren Baum would not be as important as it would be for a capital intensive manufacturing firm like Wiegandt. In 1993, FAT was 9.1 which displays Hafren Baum’s ability in generating sales were higher as compared to FAT of 7.1 in 1995. Again, the important factor that is effecting this efficiency is the construction of new outlets in addition to lower sales …show more content…

In 1993, average account receivable was 53 which indicates firm had a better ability to collect funds from customers than it is in next two years of 77 days. The reason for increase in average collection period could be because of providing relaxed credit policy to maintain sales because of the economic conditions in Germany, or to compete with the new furniture retailers from Europe. However, Hafren Baum is not a strong firm that has a huge market share that could afford longer average collection period. In 1994 and 1995 the average number of days it took Hafren Baum to sell inventory was 129; that shows the firm is less efficient in managing inventory than it was in 1993 (103 inventory in days). Due to more outlets firm might have expected higher sales and this could also have led to higher

More about Hafren Bum Essay

Open Document