More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of juvenile delinquency in a society
Effects of juvenile delinquency in a society
Effects of juvenile delinquency in a society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Juveniles should not receive mandatory life in prison because their brains aren’t fully developed which is why we treat them differently from adults. Just because they commit a crime does not make them older, they should be treated the same way regardless of the crime. In the United States, we grow up in a violent loving culture with weapons being shown in movies, talked about in music, TV shows, and even cartoons. Not everybody grows up in perfect living conditions, and because they are still young they are influenced by what they see and experience around them. When kids commit a crime, it shouldn’t go unpunished however; they shouldn’t be sentenced to life. Sentencing a child to prison for the rest of his or her life should never be an …show more content…
On the other hand, in Jennifer Jenkins article On Punishment and Teen Killers; she says, “if brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world”. This statement in general is true however, not all countries have the same violent loving culture that the United States developed which has an effect on these children. Not only should their brain development be taken into consideration but also their living environment, mental stability, and personality. In Scott Anderson’s Greg Ousely Is Sorry for Killing His Parents, Greg Ousley told his mom he had thoughts of murder but was neglected the attention he clearly needed. While Greg was doing his time, he got his education while deeply regretting what he had done and wants to help other young kids who are in the situation he was in. Greg is a prime example that people have the ability to change, especially at a young age. Not everybody is the same; each person is different in their own way and reacts differently to different situations. If a 13 year old can be faced with the same consequences as an adult, then that 13 year old should also be able to smoke, drink, live independently without any parental control, or simply have the same privileges as adults do. We treat a 13 year old differently from a 30 year old simply because the 13 year old is younger and is still considered a child, but why is it when they commit a crime they are now seen as the 30 year old. In Marjie Lundstrom’s article Kids are Kids – Until they Commit Crimes, he says, “the bigger the crime, the more eager we are to call them adults” and that,
In the article “Greg Ousley Is Sorry for Killing His Parents” by Scott Anderson claims that Greg shall not be sentenced in jail for a long period of time. These individuals conjecture that Greg must not stay in the jail he is being held in. Greg claims that he is one changed man and that he wishes to help young kids that thought equally the same. Should we trust both individuals about this manifestation? Or is this occurring because of another planned crime that we may not know about ?
“You are hereby sentenced to life without the possibility of parole”. These are the words that a juvenile in America is likely to hear. Collectively, as a nation, the United States has incarcerated more juveniles with life sentences than any other nation. With this fact the arguments arise that juveniles should not be punished the same was as an adult would be but, is that really how the justice system should work? To allow a juvenile who recently robbed a store only get a slap on the wrist? Not comprehending that there are consequences for their actions and how what they have done affects the victims.
When it comes to minors, we try to keep a balance between our logistic and moral views on the issue of their imprisonment. Usually, we end up thinking morally, but that isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Children raised in harsh conditions or without adequate parenting could stay bad forever, or grow up to become a great person. A huge slip up shouldn’t take their life. We could think that the children could stay bad forever and become an even bigger problem later in life, but prison time works well to deter against that. The supreme court was right. It’s completely wrong to sentence a minor to
On the contrary Jenkins argues that if that was the case, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all around the world. On my behalf I concur with Jenkins because everyone is responsible for their own actions and behavior. Consciousness, is what awares our minds whether we decide if we want to do something or not and what is right and wrong. If brain underdevelopment is supposedly one of the reasons, then why aren 't my siblings and I kill people like the other juveniles who are. Professor Stephen Morse reasons that “the actual science does not in any way negate criminal culpability”. We cannot incriminate science or anything because every individual will be different in many aspects because every kid matures and grows at different ages and stages. For example, from my own experiences I have seen a twelve year old child be more mature and formal than a thirty year old adult. In some cases, some children mature when they go through puberty, others till later or maybe even at a very young age.. The “underdevelopment brain” argument should not be an issue to interfere with why a juvenile should not be trial to life in prison. Although a teenager will suggest and demand that their emotions ran high, which was why they killed somebody and their
Heinous crimes are considered brutal and common among adults who commit these crimes, but among children with a young age, it is something that is now being counted for an adult trial and punishable with life sentencing. Although some people agree with this decision being made by judges, It is my foremost belief that juveniles don’t deserve to be given life sentencing without being given a chance at rehabilitation. If this goes on there’s no point in even having a juvenile system if children are not being rehabilitated and just being sent off to prison for the rest of their lives and having no chance getting an education or future. Gail Garinger’s article “ juveniles Don’t deserve Life sentence”, written March 14, 2012 and published by New york Times, mentions that “ Nationwide, 79 adolescents have been sentenced to die in prison-a sentence not imposed on children anywhere else in the world. These children were told that they could never change and that no one cared what became of them. They were denied access to education and rehabilitation programs and left without help or hope”. I myself know what it’s like to be in a situation like that, and i also know that people are capable of changing even children when they are young and still growing.
Fair sentencing of youth state's “Children sentenced to life in prison without parole are often the most vulnerable members of our society” The Gail Garinger article, “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” discusses about children deserving a second opportunity. According to Garinger, children should receive a second chance and help so they could be mentally stable. According to Justice Elena Kagan she discusses that Juveniles without parole affects the way he develops throughout his life time. I agree with the majority decision that Juveniles should not be sentenced to life in prison and that they should be given a second chance because they deserve to fix their mistakes.
There are families of loved ones who were brutally murdered by a Juvenile and just want pure justice. When Juveniles are charged for a first degree murder crime, sentencing them to life without parole is a must.
Juvenile do not deserve life in prison, they will not be able to handle it. I agree with the group of judges who believe juveniles to not deserve life sentences. They have a great chance at rehabilitation. It only takes something or someone to help them stay out of troubl
While many argue that juveniles who commit serious crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults, the fact is, juveniles under the age of eighteen, are not adults, and should not be treated as such. Juveniles are not mature enough or developed psychologically, and, therefore, do not consider the consequences of their actions. In the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” by Thompson, the writer argues that juveniles are not adults. Their brains develop at different stages and they learn skills that they need to learn at a certain time.
In the twenty first century there have been many cases of kids committing murder, whether it is the relationships they hold at home or the video games they play, the environment a child is exposed to will affect their developmental process. Children are supposed to be innocent and pure without the desire to kill, yet in the last 50 years official statistics on Listverse.com suggest that over 1,100 kids have been found guilty of murder in England alone. The average age of a child that kills is just about fourteen years old. These kids are usually brought up in an environment that does not teach them right from wrong.
Children should definitely be tried as an adult and punished as an adult for crimes, or otherwise, nothing is stopping them from doing it again. Being put in “Juvie” until you are eighteen because you violently killed someone as a fifteen year old is absolutely unacceptable and not near harsh enough of a punishment, The living conditions are better there than in some of their own homes! Nothing is stopping them from doing the same thing
Many people claim that the child did not know any better, or that he was brought up with the idea that this behavior is acceptable. Although there is some truth to these allegations, the reality of this social issue is far more complex. Therefore we ask the question, "Should childhood offenders of capital crimes be treated as adults?" To begin with, numerous reasons for why a child acts in the manner he exhibits and why he continues to exert such dangerous and even fatal schemes. Recent research shows that factors ranging from inherited personality traits to chemical imbalances and damages suffered in the womb can increase the odds that a child will become violent (Johnson 234).
For instance, juveniles do not deserve life sentences because their brain isn’t fully developed yet and lack awareness of their actions. In the article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” by Paul Thompson, he explains the development of the brain and how in some situations the brain isn’t ready and it can affect the person. This effect in divergent ways; psychologically and emotionally. Thompson's article introduces the case of Nathaniel Brazill, at age 14, charged with second degree murder, trial as an adult and sentenced to life in prison without parole. After some serious research, it has shown that as many other juveniles who have committed a crime they are “far from adulthood”.
Many of the times, a juvenile will commit a crime then deny that he or she never was aware of what they did, but it is not quite correct. As the article from Jennifer Jenkins, “On Punishment and Teen Killers” conveys more of a complex way that the development of the brain has to have no impact on the fact of making an inhuman criminal intent. As quoted, “ After a series of other crimes , he planned the murders for months, carefully and privately. “ it mentions that he was aware of the actions he was going to act on and knew exactly for the things that he was going to do before committing the murder. As another quote shows, “ he was not mentally disabled-in fact was quite intelligent.” It provides a more complex way to understand that juveniles along with younger children have no sense of humor towards committing a crime such like these that they know exactly the consequences that would be in their hands. It reflects much on how many juveniles are treated as adults for the things they do wrong but its more wrong to give an adult a punishment that a juvenile wouldn’t receive as
According to Scott Anderson interview with Greg Ousley, the reason why young people commit crimes is because the environment that they live in. “I had been thinking about killing them every time I get mad,” he told his interrogator. “They don’t seem to understand me.” Indicative of either his youth or his mental state at that moment, Greg made a forlorn request of the detective: “Please don’t tell my family” (Anderson). Today teenagers are being abuse from their parents and are living in a negative homes and hanging out with misleading friends. The author of this article gives the main issue of the massacre which is his youth and mental anger issues. This states that the main problem is the lifestyle with his parents. Likewise in the article “Kids are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes” have a similarity about why their growth are not fully mature. It is a vexing question these days for under-eighteen crowd, the group we routinely write off as “only kids.” It’s why they can’t smoke, or drink, or go to R Movies without our OK. It’s is why they don’t vote. It’s why they have curfews. It’s why we fret over their Internet access and fuss about driving privileges” (Lunderstorm 45). Teenagers have restrictions about what they should not do every day in their lives. With this mindset, teenager have no other way, but to commit crimes to satisfy their needs and wants life. The reason why is since teenagers do not understand that they are committing crimes is because of their deficiency on thinking about the consequences and their actions. The reality is that juveniles are unintelligible on the decisions they