Grade Inflation Gone Wild Summary

657 Words2 Pages

In the op-ed, “Grade Inflation Gone Wild,” Stuart Rojstaczer addresses the concern of grade inflation and its effects on students. Rojstaczer uses several different methods to prove his point of view to the reader. Rojstaczer links grade inflation to the sinking quality of education, as well as the rise of college alcoholics. While this op-ed does a satisfactory job appealing to the reader on a person-person basis, many of Rojstaczer’s main claims do not hold any scholarly evidence. This analysis over “Grade Inflation Gone Wild” will discuss whether Rojstaczer has written this editorial solely to convince readers of his opinion, or does Rojstaczer present a credible claim in higher education’s grade inflation. Rojstaczer is a geophysics Professor at Duke University. Therefore, in his situation he is at an optimal position to witness problems concerning college grade inflation. Rojstaczer explains, “…students walk into a classroom knowing that they can go through the motions and get a B+ or better…give minimal effort.” (Rojstaczer 68) In addition to that statement, he also links the lack of rigor to the rise of college drinking, based on “…a recent survey.” (68) Throughout this editorial, Rojstaczer presents a …show more content…

He is able to successfully build this relationship based on his audience. The Christian Science Monitor is a subscription magazine that costs about eight dollars a month. Based on the price of this magazine, as well as the content, the probable audience would most likely be middle class adults. This would be the optimal audience for an editorial over college grade inflation. Most likely the readers will be parents of students either attending college, or about to attend college. Also, this audience would most likely be more politically active in supporting Rojstaczer’s claims. This makes the Christian Science Monitor the ideal venue to submit this

Open Document