Good And Evil In Frenzy Movie

801 Words2 Pages

One of Hitchcock’s more graphic films is Frenzy (1972). He confuses the audience by having them identify with both the murderer and the victim. Hitchcock also has an unlikable protagonist who is innocent and a likeable antagonist who is the murderer. “By having disturbed individuals for heroes, casting these parts with attractive and established stars and by deliberately using this technique for identification, Hitchcock’s scorn for the false values of his audience cannot be more clearly exemplified” (Sonbert, 2015, p. 36). Hitchcock knew how to exploit the audiences’ feelings for the actor that portrays a specific character. Good versus evil is a moral code that the audience has to question. The characters they are forced to like often are …show more content…

103). Hitchcock needed a leading lady who would attract men and whom women could identify with. “The Hitchcock blonde is known for her smoldering sexuality, a quality fully revealed in private. She is also supremely feminine, well dressed, impeccably groomed, and always in full make-up” (Friddel, 2015, p. 103). Hitchcock often worked with bombshell blondes like Grace Kelly Ingrid Bergman, and Tippi Hedren who all shared similar characteristics. In Fincher’s most recent film Gone Girl (2014), the main character Amy Dunne, played by Rosamund Pike, portrays the Hitchcock blonde. She is spoiled by her moneyed upbringing and is always put together. “Hitchcock was a master of using actors with whom the audience can sympathize despite their role as an unsympathetic character” (Kohn, 2015, p. 99). This ties in again with having charming antagonists to create a sort of unpredictability. Fincher also has particular actors he collaborates with habitually. Brad Pitt was his leading man in Seven (1995), Fight Club (1999), and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008). According to David Fincher, “On-screen and off-screen, Brad's the ultimate guy. If I could be anyone, it would be Brad Pitt. Even if I could not look like him. Just to be him. He has such a great ease with who he is” (Knapp, 2014, p. xvi). Brad Pitt is Hitchcock’s Cary Grant or James Stewart (Knapp, …show more content…

Gus Van Sant’s remake of Psycho (1998) was not so much of a remake as it was a recreation of Hitchcock’s classic film shot by shot. “Van Sant’s Psycho, strips away Hitchcock’s original meanings and gestures without replacing them with anything else” (Leitch, 2003, p. 254). To remake a Hitchcock without Hitchcock is inevitably challenging. David Fincher’s next project is a modern take on Hitchcock’s 1951 film Strangers on a Train (Kreps, 2015). To remake the master of suspense’s classic film puts a lot of pressure on Fincher with such high expectations to meet. It will be a modern take on the storyline and will cut the title to just Strangers. Many directors who attempt to remake Hitchcock films do not succeed. They cannot find a way to improve the film or to incorporate their own meanings or messages into the film. Fincher will have to create his own interruption to display how his style is his own and not just recreate Hitchcock’s film shot for

Open Document