God, Gold, And Colonialism In Things Fall Apart By Chinua Achebe

1144 Words3 Pages

Chinua Achebe wrote “Things Fall Apart” to express his discontent of how Africans were portrayed in Western Literature and Art Forms. They were stereotypically portrayed as savages or ignorant of the world around them. He wanted to portray them from someone inside their own race. He focused on the different concerns and characteristics of a typical post-colonial literature. You can see their struggle to reclaim spaces and places, their assertion of cultural integrity, and the way their history was rewritten. You can also make out the resistant descriptions of their culture and such, the appropriation of their colonizer’s language, and the way their colonial art forms were reworked. When the Colonizer’s started asserting themselves in …show more content…

They decided to colonize us because of three main reasons: God, Gold, and Glory. Most would say that it is more of the latter two than the former because the former just came along with the other two; which is true but they still use the former against us. As more and more people got into Christianity, the Church leaders here in our country became harsher and cruel. They told us lies such as we need to pay an amount of money in order for our sins to be forgiven; they told us that the less we give to the church every mass, the fewer blessings we will receive. What our ancestors did during the rebellion of Andres Bonifacio and of other Philippine heroes, was us trying to reclaim our right to our homeland or basically us trying to reclaim our space and place. Unlike how Jose Rizal only wanted us to be integrated with Spain and become their province. The resistant descriptions against stereotypes alone are expressed strongly in this novel. The author has done a remarkable job surpassing all the stereotypes, inaccuracies, generalizations, and such that the English colonizers have circulated in different …show more content…

The English blamed the natives for the injustices that the natives experienced. They made it seem like the natives were the bad guys and the English were the good ones. Chinua Achebe contradicted that. He wrote as if no one was good or bad. Everyone was a human being trying to survive this dog-eat-dog world. When Okonkwo, together with a couple of other tribesmen, rose up against the English, it is depicted as something that was not technically moral but was right at the same time. How the English reacted was not ethical as well but it is how a person should or might react in such a

Open Document