Giving Way to the Id

1442 Words3 Pages

One of the central theme’s throughout Shakespeare’s Hamlet is the question of madness versus sanity. From the first few scenes of the play, one cannot help but question the way that various character’s throughout the play think and behave. In line with Sigmund Freud’s ideas concerning the Id, Ego, and Superego, we see that various characters’ behaviors are clearly defined by these distinct personality structures although not always in the way they are traditionally expected to. Gertrude and Hamlet both find themselves eventually losing control of their lives as they all give way to the Id portion of their personality. It is this downfall that will continually come across as the madness so central and destructive throughout the course of the play.

Gertrude, as the Queen and mother of Hamlet, should exemplify the traits of the Superego defined by Freud. He states that the superego is the “internalized ideals that we have acquired from our parents or society.” (Freud) Given the roles that she plays throughout the play it is reasonable to expect that Gertrude would serve as a moral compass throughout the play and help to encourage righteous behaviors within the other characters. Instead of regulating the morality of her kingdom, Gertrude loses a sense of her role earlier than any of the other characters.
By the time that the play has begun we see that she has substituted “marriage nuptials for mourning rituals” (Bergoffen 146 ) and as a result has suggested to the people around her that there is no reason to mourn and rather that Hamlet, and the rest of Denmark should “cast thy nighted color off... Do not forever with thy vailed lids seek for they noble father in the dust.” ( Shakespeare 25) essentially telling the people to move...

... middle of paper ...

...ted.
The people of Denmark at this time were not to blame totally for their fall into Id-like behavior. They had been under the rule of once-righteous leaders who had fallen and as a result cause there to be “something rotten in the state of Denmark” ( Shakespeare 45). The Id progressed with astounding power throughout the play proving in reality how similar it is to the Superego. For both Gertrude and Hamlet, it was far too easy for them to let down their guard causing them to be slaves to their bodies and emotions rather than logically progressing using careful use of the regulating ego. Both of these characters experienced seemingly inevitable deaths which although considered a tragedy were the only way for the kingdom to be reborn and experience the normalcy that King Fortibras would bring as a result of a more natural development of The Id, Ego, and Superego.

Open Document