Gerrymandering Essay

869 Words2 Pages

Many Americans seem to be baffled by whether to praise the role of courts in the reapportionment of state legislatures, or to lament it. Reapportionment is the process of dividing the total number of seats, or memberships (435) in the House of Representatives among the 50 states. The passage from Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the US Constitution is the foremost base for conducting a decennial census. In 1790, the first decennial census was conducted in direction of Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State at that time. With the help of census data, the number of House seats each state is entitled to have over the period of next ten years is calculated (“Reapportionment and Redistricting”, p. 7). Gerrymandering is the process of manipulating …show more content…

Since gerrymandering is the process of dividing legislative districts with a clear motive of attaining the most seats in legislature as possible, we can say that this is done for partisan gain and not for the good of the country and general people. In a sound democratic system, voters should be able to choose their representatives through elections. However, when representatives get the chance to draw their own legislative district lines, lawmakers have the power to choose their voters instead. When one political party has control over the state government, voters in the opposition party are unable to come up with an effective strategy within a reasonable time-frame. Everyone: Voters, representatives and our democracy all lose. Gerrymandering is not just the geographical division, but those lines can often lead to cut traditional legislative districts off from one another. For instance, if someone from a particular region is bounded to some cultural and traditional practices and if the area was gerrymandered in irregular manner, it would completely cut off cultural, traditional and historical communities from one another. This practice cripples the power of voters, has continued for a really long time and must come to an …show more content…

In the past couple of years, courts have over and again demolished maps that press down the voices of Americans based on race. Some maps that have been struck down by the courts include one in Florida, North Carolina, Texas and Virginia for unconstitutional racial gerrymandering. In my personal opinion, since the Supreme Court is the highest law governing body of the nation, it should intervene in such matters that has drawn concerns of huge proportion of the American population. This battle for equal representation of people all around the nation is extremely important for protecting the democracy and making the nation’s administration responsible to the general population. This broken framework needs to be settled and the Supreme Court plays the most significant role in achieving

Open Document