Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of gentrification essay
Consequences of gentrification essay
Consequences of gentrification essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of gentrification essay
On the first day of class, the characteristics that I wished to one day maybe live in were: a suburb that is friendly, has above average education, good road maintenance, and a lot of parks or preserves around it. Now that I have more knowledge on what to expect in the near future, I have a superior vision on what I would like my future neighborhood to be. After taking and contemplating on this class, personally, I would love to live in an inner ring suburb neighborhood that would prevent urban sprawl, including gentrification problems. Although it is important to realize that there might be more crime in inner ring suburbs, I can argue that there are other prominent problems to worry about. I would choose to stay in a neighborhood similar to …show more content…
Notwithstanding, there are various positive characteristics of outer ring suburbs, such as cheaper housing, bigger housing, lower taxes, ample parking, and it is a lot more safer, but even then, I would choose to live in an inner ring suburb. Moreover, another reason to why I would choose to live in a neighborhood in an inner ring suburb, has to do with the prevention of the negative aspects of gentrification. Although gentrification has promoted the overturn of poor neighborhood, increasing property values, the middle class returning, and preventing urban sprawl, the negative effects it has on individuals that have lived there for many years is devastating. Unfortunately, inner city residents have to endure the prices of their property taxes going up, causing them to feel uncomfortable, specifically financially. In addition, the old residents are forced out by the young, middle class, graduate students that are looking for cheap housing. Gentrification also includes the deterioration of old businesses that are overtaken by new businesses, such as
Gentrification is defined as the process by which the wealthy or upper middle class uproot poorer individuals through the renovation and rebuilding of poor neighborhoods. Many long-term residents find themselves no longer able to afford to live in an area, where the rent and property values are increasing. Gentrification is a very controversial topic, revealing both the positive and negative aspects of the process. Some of the more desirable outcomes include reduced crime rate, increased economic activity, and the building of new infrastructures. However, it is debated whether the negatives overwhelm the positive. An increase in the number of evictions of low-income families, often racial minorities can lead to a decline of diversity
Vancouver is not affordable to live for the young professionals due to gentrification problems. The economy requires gentrification to develop the city. In order for a city to flow better, more people have to spend and sell. Furthermore, for people to spend or sell more, it requires more people to live. However, gentrification is pushing people away from their homes, and makes it difficult for the young professionals to move in. Therefore, a lot of young professionals and working class would move out and live outside the city.
... motivation for wealthy individuals to return to the inner-city core but it also provides impetus for commercial and retail mixed-use to follow, increasing local revenue for cities (Duany, 2001). Proponents of gentrification profess that this increase in municipal revenue from sales and property taxes allows for the funding of city improvements, in the form of job opportunities, improved schools and parks, retail markets and increased sense of security and safety ((Davidson (2009), Ellen & O’Reagan (2007), Formoso et. al (2010)). Due to the increase in housing and private rental prices and the general decrease of the affordable housing stock in gentrifying areas, financially-precarious communities such as the elderly, female-headed households, and blue-collar workers can no longer afford to live in newly developed spaces ((Schill & Nathan (1983), Atkinson, (2000)).
This investigation is based on the assumption that gentrification with all its troubles can’t be prevented and is an inherent part of every city. What are the negative impacts of gentrification? What are the underlying mechanisms that feed these impacts? What drives these mechanisms? What would be an alternative scenario?
In discussions of Gentrification, one controversial issue has been with displacement. Gentrification is the process of renovating and repairing a house or district so that it complies to wealthier residents (Biro, 2007, p. 42). Displacement is a result of gentrification, and is a major issue for lower income families. Gentrification is causing lower-income residents to move out of their apartments because they’re being displaced by upper class residents who can afford high rent prices and more successful businesses. Throughout out the essay, I will discuss how gentrification affects lower income residents and how it results in displacement. Then I will follow on by discussing some positive and negative effects that take place because of Gentrification.
The Negative Effects of Gentrification in Oakland A very big local issue in Oakland and the Bay Area is and has continued to be Gentrification. Gentrification is, “The process of renovating and improving a house or district so that it conforms to middle-class taste” (Google). Gentrification has displaced and continues to displace many low-income minorities. As prices of houses and rent costs have gone up, many have been forced to flee. This has made this problem increasingly recognized in my community as it has affected many of us.
Gentrification is one of the many factors that can have a great impact on small urban areas. In the 21st century we can now see the drastic change a community has gone through. It may be seen as a positive change for those who benefit from it, but for other it may deeply affect them. Since the last century, areas like Long Beach and Hawthorne have gone through cultural changes. Making those who have been the majority have been “kicked” out from where they have lived for years. In the coming years, rent may increase along with the mortgages, cultural rates. New shops, or other buildings may appear “washing” the community that was once unknown and untouched by outsiders. By seeing the change in communities as such, there should be a solution
Gentrification does not follow traditional urban growth theory, which predicts ?the decline of inner city areas as monied classes move to the metropolitan fringe.? The traditional economic model of real estate says that wealthy people can choose their housing from the total city market (Schwirian 96). Once these people decide to live in the suburbs, the lower social classes move into the old homes of the upper class, essentially handing housing down the socioeconomic ladder. Gentrification is actually a reversal of this process. For a variety of reasons, many inner city areas are becoming more attractive to the wealthy, and they are selecting their housing in those areas (Schwirian 96). The problem is that now when the wealthy take over poor homes and renovate them, the poor cannot afford the housing that the wealthy have abandoned. Many researchers have argued whether gentrification has truly created problems in cities. I will analyze the arguments for and against gentrification by exploring the subject from both sides.
Now that the amenity value of the neighborhood has improved in a durable way, restrictions on supply lead to big increases in housing prices” (Salam, 2014, p. 35). When a neighborhood under goes gentrification, the home prices skyrockets so then the owners have to pay high taxes which leads them to increase their rent. The good news is that the neighborhood will directly benefit from the expanded tax base as it is used in building better schools, parks, libraries, more convenient public transportations, which allows people to live a more luxurious life. Thus, by increasing land values, gentrification can financially benefit residents who own their homes. Not only does it benefit high status families, it also brings an opportunity in moving upward to low income people who manage to stay in gentrifying areas. “Lower-income children benefit significantly from living in more mixed-income neighborhoods; they tend to experience less violence and crime, attend better schools, and have better role models” (Litman, 2017, p. 2).
The process of gentrification although positive for the community, can have a negative effect on social class. “Social class grounded in sets of power relations consisting of domination and exploitation in which gentrification is the neighborhood expression” (Slater 2009:297). However, the overall perception is not always so welcoming to those of meager means and therefore, inequality will remain to cause segregation among the classes due to this perception. As a result, lower-income families dare not go into a business in a recently gentrified area because of its perception. For myself, I can say that many times I have seen a store or shop, but if it looks expensive on the outside, I perceive it must expensive inside and tend not to go
gentrification is not only changing the face of the city and also help people in their daily lives. They can enjoy many preferential policies such as the street is extended facilitate traffic, the disease is equipped with modern equipment in service for healing, their children are studying in good schools than before
Whites who do the same as people of color aren’t thought upon as a threat.
The original intent of street development in our country appeared to be for the legitimate reasons of postal service and agricultural shipping routes. Not until the automobile industry and economic opportunists got involved did the transportation system in America start to change. The system of buses and streetcars in the cities appeared to be functioning reasonably well. The theory of “if it’s not broke, don’t fix it” was not applied here. The auto industry convinced numerous cities to rid their streets of the streetcars and cut back on bus transportation. Overall results were good, for the auto industry. Urban centers started to lose large portions of their downtown populations to urban flight out of the city. The stereotypical suburban style living be...
The two neighborhoods that I chose to use for this assignment are vastly different. The main reason is because they are on opposite sides of the country. The first neighborhood that I visited is the one that I grew up in. This neighborhood is in Connecticut, on the East Coast, all the way across the country from the neighborhood that I currently live in here in West Hollywood. Most of my family lives in Connecticut and Massachusetts and I’m the only one who lives on the West Coast. A big difference is that the neighborhood in Connecticut has houses that are more spaced out, have larger lawns, and very many more trees. There are very few apartments there, unlike where I live now where my entire street is almost all apartment buildings.
There are various influences on everyone’s lives while growing up. I believe the greatest of these influences is the neighborhood you grew up in. I grew up in a quite large, welcoming neighborhood. While living in this neighborhood, I was outgoing and remarkably talkative. Making friends became second nature to me. Playing outdoors from sunrise to sundown playing sports or exploring the outdoors with my friends became a daily routine for me. I was outgoing, talkative, and active. I believe this is the result of the neighborhood I grew up in.