Genghis Khan's Impact On Society

984 Words2 Pages

Many of the early civilizations are only remembered because of their size and their major accomplishments and these civilizations are remembered today because they at some point had a great leader who was able to spread their empire to their highest point. These empires would become united for a short period of time because the culture of the leader happened to spread or mix with the culture of the people who have been conquered. Genghis Khan is no exception. Genghis Khan does not deserve the recognition that he received from the byproducts of his conquests that he never intended to happen by the raping and killing of many people when trade would have been a sufficient solution.
Genghis Khan was a great military leader and was able to spread …show more content…

Many of these books, “brush off 30-50 million deaths…. A sentence here or there saying yes the Mongols did great damage in certain places but that’s dwarfed by their impact on globalization and trade and commerce” (00:9:33- 00:9:46). Historians want readers to focus on the positive things that happened during their rule rather than the killing of the millions of people because if the positive things didn’t happen and they only talked about the killing the Mongols would just be seen as ruthless killers and only a menace rather than the people who helped to spread culture and trade throughout Central Asia and Europe. Without the positive things that historians credit them for many of the greatest leaders would have a very different demeanor in the fact that they would be perceived very differently without the knowledge of them doing something good that cancelled out all the killing that they did to accomplish it. Many conquerors would be viewed very differently today, “ if you take away or exclude these byproducts of these historical conquerors careers, things like the spread of hellenism for Alexander. These conquerors begin to look like people who came on the scene and inflicted a horrific amount of killing and suffering on other for no good reason. Unless you consider conquest a good reason all by itself” (00:13:49- 00:14:14). Without the following results of the conquests of these different leaders they would be perceived by people today as blood-thirsty killers who only lead battle for the joy of killing people. Many of these peaceful ages come after their empire has spread to its fullest which is caused after the death of many people who didn’t deserve to die. Many conquerors killed people for glory and the

Open Document