Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elizabethan era, GREEK THEATRE
Elizabethan era, GREEK THEATRE
Greek and modern theatre
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elizabethan era, GREEK THEATRE
Today, actors have a new way of living. They do not realize how different their lives would have been if they lived during the Greek and Elizabethan time period. Acting has changed throughout history based off of gender roles, how the performances were conducted, and the social status of the actors and audience.
In the beginning of theatre acting, woman were an outcast of society. They were not allowed to attend the performances or even be an actress. All the plays were made up of men. It showed the masculinity and power of the actor. Men had to dress up like women when they needed a lady part. The image of women did not change much because they appeared as male actors. (Gender Roles: The direction, development, and drama of women in live theater).
…show more content…
They threw festivals for him. In 500 BC, a dramatist named Thespis implemented a solo actor, and he told speeches about each of the characters, and he changed his masks depending on which character was talking. He would talk to the narrator which was the chorus. In 471 BC, another dramatist named Aeschylus created a second actor which allowed dialogue between them on stage. Only three years later, Sophocles came up with an idea that would make a complex dramatic situation by adding a third character. They still kept the same ideas when there was only one actor on stage such as, switching characters means switching masks. The chorus itself acted like another character and not always a narrator. Because there were more actors on stage, they were able to expand their plays to the entire group of Greek mythology and not just the theatre god Dionysus (Ancient Greek Theatre). As time progressed, the acting industry started to form into modern day acting. They started to have more actors talking to actors instead of them talking to the chorus (Ancient Greek Theatre). Instead of having the audience surrounding the actors completely, the audience is now seated in front of them and slightly on the side. Back then, the actors purpose was to talk to the audience. They would talk to the audience more than they would talk to each other. Nowadays, the actors talk to each other, and they do not speak to the audience for the most because if they do, it would be out of character. The lines today are meant to be a real life scenario. It was not meant to argue with each other and try to get the audience on their side. Back then, they had a core group of actors, and they played together for several years. It was the same cast for each play. There are no new cast members. They had to perform a new play almost everyday, so they did not have a lot of time to rehearse. Today, the
Othello represents a prime example of Shakespeare's ability to develop relationships between the sexes so as to demonstrate those relationships' weaknesses. In Othello, the sexes are divided by misconceptions and ego- centric views of the opposite gender. The men of the play, in particular Othello, maintain a patriarchal, chivalric notion of the sexes, while the women of the play yearn for more involvement in their husbands' affairs. So it is that the thrust of the play emerges from "the opposition of attitudes, viewpoints, and sexes." (Neely 214)
Before the times of Elizabethan England, there was the administration of something called the sumptuary laws. These laws were put up in almost every city, town and nation state with the goal to regulate who wore what. The main purposes of this law were to regulate commerce, to help support local industries, and help prevent the flaunting of wealth. This law ended up being very important when it came to gender roles during this time. While this law was mainly put in place because of wealth, gender was a subset effect of this law and this could be seen very clearly especially when it came to the theater. Cross-dressing was very common on the English stage because the majority of the time they had men playing all the roles including the women. Therefore it began a conversation about what the true effects of this law
But what about the years before women began acting? What about Shakespeare's time? Who played Juliet or Desdemona or Rosalind during "the golden age of English history", the Elizabethan era? This was back when theatre was the highest form of entertainment (bear-baiting being a close second, of course) and people of all backgrounds and status would flock to a tour stop or later, one of many permanent theatres around London. Women, as we know, weren't acting then so who would fill these female roles? The obvious answer for playwrights at the time were boy players. Contrary to present-day theatre, women were only seen on stage in the Elizabethan era as portrayed by young men.
The role of women in drama has evolved in a way which could still be improved. They have gone from being the Goddesses of love and desire, to characters played by men, to characters only suitable to be played by middle class women to eventually characters played by all women but having no authority or power. This construction has been influenced by the men who have written the plays because they fear that the women characters may become too superior and that audiences won’t enjoy such a play. The construction of weak females has also been influenced by general society which simply accepts that women are useless and don’t deserve any role other than to seduce men and serve their desire.
Looking back in history, it can be easily argued that the role of the actress in society has gone through a notable evolution. During the 16th century, it was a rare occurrence for a woman to be seen on stage. Women’s roles were played by young boys. It wasn’t until the 17th century that women first appeared on the English and Parisian stages. However, it was considered improper because women were expected to remain in the shadows, and actresses had to put themselves on display in order to work. As the role of actresses evolved and they were seen more frequently on stage, society considered them to have bad morals and be prostitutes. It wasn’t until the late 19th century that the view of an actress in society had reached a respectable level.
This is to be expected in a society that did not even permit women to perform in theaters, so men played the women’s roles. Women were not allowed to perform on stage until 1660 when Charles II took the throne and the Restoration occurred (Nestvold). Hence, women are often restricted by husbands or fathers, like Juliet who was controlled by her father in Romeo and Juliet, or women are victimized by men and not in control of their own fate, like Desdemona who dies at the hands of Othello in Othello.
“The women were not allowed to star in plays mainly because they were poorly educated and they had no education so they wouldn't know what to do” found from Why Were Women Not Allowed To Act In Shakespeare’s Plays Back In Elizabethan Era? Women could not act on stage during the renaissance for many reasons people believe women did not act because women didn't have any rights, they also had no
Ancient Greece, the birthplace of theatre, continues to greatly influence theatre today. Drama is a form of poetry, because dialogue was spoken or sung in verses. Many Greek plays are still relevant today. Some plays survived on their merits, while others were preserved from academic interest or by accident (Peter Arnott). The Great Dionysia was an important yearly religious celebration and festival, honoring Dionysus, the Greek god of wine and fertility. The Great Dionysia is where theatre first began. Also, the actors of ancient Greek theatre were treated much differently than actors are today. They heavily impacted ancient theatre and shaped the way performers act today. Most actors performed in tragedies and comedies, the two main forms of theatre. These beautiful and unique genres of plays, are still popular today. Playwrights influenced Greek theatre in many ways. Three main playwrights severely influenced the way we look at theatre presently, and will forever be the reason the world loves theatre as much as it does today. Ancient Greek theatre is significant to theatre history due to the Great Dionysia, the actors, genres, and playwrights, and continues to impact modern theatre today.
Actors were expected to memorize hundreds of lines at a time. While one play could be performing, actors would be practicing lines for their next show. Play writers also began to make roles for the actors in the theatrical pieces. The theaters that actors performed in were roofless so that the sun could be used as lighting. Theatrical shows were held in the afternoon because it provided the best amount of light for the show. When the people gathered into the theater, the different classes of people were separated by where they could afford to sit and watch the show. The lower classmen were situated on the bare earth where it was dirty and smelly because it was never cleaned. The owners’ of the theaters found it less expensive if they did not keep high maintenance of their establishments. Higher classmen sat under a roof and for a penny more, they could buy cushions for their seats.
The Impact of Gender on Shakespeare’s Othello. In the book “Gender Trouble” (1990), feminist theorist Judith Butler explains “gender is not only a social construct, but also a kind of performance such as a show we put on, a costume or disguise we wear” (Butler). In other words, gender is a performance, an act, and costumes, not the main aspect of essential identity. By understanding this theory of gender as an act, performance, we can see how gender has greatly impacted the outcome of the play in William Shakespeare’s Othello.
Throughout history, females have been treated and viewed poorly through society, which continues to occur in society today. The obligation for females to fulfill a certain gender role is not as important in society today, however it still exists and is considered to be the norm in some parts of the world. In the play Othello, by William Shakespeare, men view women as a possession, which leads to men feeling threatened by female sexuality. When women fail to adhere to their gender role, they are quickly cast aside. Through the characters of Brabantio, Othello, and Iago it is displayed how women are treated and the consequences faced when gender roles are not complied.
Shakespeare and the members of the Elizabethan era would be appalled at the freedoms women experience today. The docility of Elizabethan women is almost a forgotten way of life. What we see throughout Shakespeare’s plays is an insight into the female character as perceived by Elizabethan culture. Shakespeare’s female characters reflect the Elizabethan era’s image of women; they were to be virtuous and obedient and those that were not were portrayed as undesirable and even evil.
Shakespeare wrote Othello during the Elizabethan era and was written in the last year of Queen Elizabeth I reign. It is seen as a Jacobean play but the context that it was made was Elizabethan. During this time period, it was set for Shakespeare to write in a way that appraises the Queen. Othello is a reflection of Elizabethan times but with universal themes. The culture of this time included a clear hierarchy, more barbaric in nature and a male dominance leaving women in a submissive role. During Shakespeare’s time, appearance was meant to indicate the lies within good and evil. Shakespeare uses the male characters in his play to show the contrast in how men treat women. All the men portrayed have a different social hierarchy. This idea is clearly shown throughout the characters of Iago, Othello, and Cassio. The three women in the play also play a similar idea of all having different societal roles and different hierarchy status.
Greek and Elizabethan theatre, while similar in some respects, had a few large differences. The Greeks believed in a certain unity of theme, which was prevalent throughout the production. Greek plays were often drawn from myth or of historical significance, so it seems that only ki...
Elizabethan acting was far from ‘naturalistic.’ This statement is a widely debated topic. The repertory of the Elizabethan period was highly differed from that of today as was the demands on Elizabethan actors compared to today’s actors. Elizabethan playhouses in two weeks could often present “eleven performances of ten different plays”. Playhouses would not repeat the same play two days in a row. As an actor from the playhouses could often be all or a lot of these plays that were all running at the same time, the demands on the actor were huge. “In the total winter season from August 25, 1595, through February 28, 1596,” one company gave “one hundred and fifty performances of thirty different plays.” Actors were not only required to “commit to memory an amazing number of new plays each season,” but he also had to retain old and previous performances in case they were to be performed again. “A leading actor of the Lord Admiral’s company… , had to secure and retain command of about seventy-one different roles, of which number fifty-two or fifty-three were newly learned.” The huge repertory demands of the actors gave them little time for interpretation of roles.