Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender in 20th century English literature
How does gender affect society
Essay on female figures in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender in 20th century English literature
Gender roles are extremely important in the way people view women in both modern and historical societies. Throughout history women have been characterized as weak and subservient to males and although one might argue gender roles and stereotypes have gotten better as time has passed, it is still apparent in how women are portrayed in theatre. Most, if not all, of the first playwrights, were male and because of this they had very different views of how women were to be seen in their plays. In the play’s Agamemnon by Aeschylus and Trifles by Susan Glaspell, the characters, Clytemnestra and Mrs. Wright defy the normalized gender roles and stereotypes to reinforce the plays vengeful theme.
Trifles is set in the early 1900’s where it was a woman’s
…show more content…
At the beginning of the play, Clytemnestra announces the end of the war and the return of the soldiers to Argos. The chorus responds stating “it is like the mettle of a woman’s spirit to praise the gracious gift before it is certainly there.” This is a direct punch at her authority and it corresponds to the double standard women are put under. The chorus also gives into the stereotypes of women during the time period by saying that it is just like a woman to talk before things are certain. Along with their disrespect for Clytemnestra, they also poke fun at the fact she “talks like a sensible man.” Part of the reason the chorus continuously makes fun of her is because they can’t possibly understand why a woman took the throne in Agamemnon’s absence even though she is the most qualified person to …show more content…
That is how that is.” Clytemnestra exemplifies a strong woman because she directly acknowledges the chorus’ attempt to make her seem weak and does not let them distract her from her mission of killing Agamemnon. The chorus also compares Clytemnestra to a spider web because of the thought and planning she puts into the murder of Agamemnon and his mistress. She does not deny her actions or motive for killing Agamemnon, “I cut this man’s throat, in my hope treads not within the hall of Fear” and because of this Clytemnestra is viewed as woman who went against the traditional gender roles and stereotypes of her time period to make her point. Most modern readers think of Clytemnestra as a strong character; however, the fact that she “had sent her son Orestes away and taken Aegisthus as a lover” makes her weak in the eyes of ancient Greek audiences. When Agamemnon sacrifices his daughter, he not only kills the daughter but also a piece of Clytemnestra. This triggers something in Clytemnestra and makes her think she is killing Agamemnon for Iphigenia’s
Over the course of time, the roles of men and women have changed dramatically. As women have increasingly gained more social recognition, they have also earned more significant roles in society. This change is clearly reflected in many works of literature, one of the most representative of which is Plautus's 191 B.C. drama Pseudolus, in which we meet the prostitute Phoenicium. Although the motivation behind nearly every action in the play, she is glimpsed only briefly, never speaks directly, and earns little respect from the male characters surrounding her, a situation that roughly parallels a woman's role in Roman society of that period. Women of the time, in other words, were to be seen and not heard. Their sole purpose was to please or to benefit men. As time passed, though, women earned more responsibility, allowing them to become stronger and hold more influence. The women who inspired Lope de Vega's early seventeenth-century drama Fuente Ovejuna, for instance, rose up against not only the male officials of their tiny village, but the cruel (male) dictator busy oppressing so much of Spain as a whole. The roles women play in literature have evolved correspondingly, and, by comparing The Epic of Gilgamesh, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, and The Wife of Bath's Prologue, we can see that fictional women have just as increasingly as their real-word counterparts used gender differences as weapons against men.
During the Elizabethan era women had a status of subordination towards men. They had a role to marry and oblige to their husband’s wishes. Shakespearean literature, especially illustrates how a woman is psychologically and physically lesser to their male counterpart. The play, Othello, uses that aspect in many different ways. From a Feminist lens others are able to vividly examine how women were subjected to blatant inferiority. Being displayed as tools for men to abuse, women were characterized as possessions and submissive; only during the last portion of the play did the power of women take heed.
Shakespeare’s tragic play Othello is an unfortunate example of gender bias, of sexism which takes advantage of women. The three women characters in the drama are all, in their own ways, victims of men’s skewed attitudes regarding women. Let us delve into this topic in this essay.
Gender roles and inequality are still evolving and continue to change. It has only been not that long ago that women started to break out their outlined roles and looked at about the same or- almost the same level- as men on a wide scale basis. Indeed, some women in certain parts of the world are still represented in the same way as in both plays that will be compared in this essay. The characters in Susan Glaspell’s Trifles and Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll's House highlight the challenges of gender roles. The attention focused on points of comparison and contrast of men vs women's reactions in the course of both plays, which, allow the audience to think about gender identity and role conflicts. The other common shared view in both plays is that they are both showcased from a female perspective.
Aeschylus begins by portraying Clytemnestra as Agamemnon’s faithful wife brought only to a murderous rampage by the news of her daughter’s murder, but indeed she was stricken with the curse of jealousy and had a yearning so strong to maintain power she killed the father of her
This action causes a great deal of rage in Clytemnestra. One could very well understand why she would act this way. Clytemnestra see’s the killing of her daughter as just being killed for her husband’s gain. She also feels that he could have chosen a different virgin to sacrifice. One the other hand, if one looks at Agamemnon’s problem they could be otherwise. Agamemnon was the general of his army and the leader that his men looked up to. So when the profit came to him saying I will give you wind for a virgin sacrifice he took it as sacrificing someone close to him. He thought along the lines that he was asked for a reason to be the one doing the actual sacrifice. So Agamemnon chooses his daughter the virgin and sacrificed her with good judgment for what was best for the army. The issue is that Clytemnestra does not see it this way and that is what causes the future events that make us to question her innocence.
The play was considered comic by the ancient Athenians because of its rhyming lyricism, its song and dance, its bawdy puns, but most of all because the notion and methods of female empowerment conceived in the play were perfectly ridiculous. Yet, as is the case in a number of Aristophanes’ plays, he has presented an intricate vision of genuine human crisis. In true, comic form Aristophanes superficially resolves the play’s conflicts celebrating the absurdity of dramatic communication. It is these loose threads that are most rife with tragedy for modern reader. By exploring an ancient perspective on female domesticity, male political and military power, rape, and efforts to maintain the integrity of the female body, we can liberate our modern dialogue.
592). Additionally, when Agamemnon returns, his wife greets him and pressures him into walking on precious tapestries meant for the gods. A few multiplicities indicate suspicion within the home. First, the tapestries are a deep-red color, like blood. By walking on this fabric, he is essentially walking through a trail of his blood to his death which awaits him inside. More importantly, the fact that Clytemnestra persuaded her husband by instigating competition through remarks about “what Priam would have done” and his “judgement” draw upon Clytemnestra’s deceptive side and show her power as a woman (Aeschylus ln. 934). The multiplicity in this instance is not a hidden meaning of words, but a subtle advancement of women in
In Aeschylus’ Agamemnon there are many different opinions about what kind of king and commander Agamemnon was. Some argued that he was good, while others dispute that his motives were wrong. Clytemnestra, Agamemnon’s wife, gained a strong hatred for him, after he sacrificed his own daughter so he could go to war. Many believe that this was not necessary and could have been overcome. The chorus seems to agree with this to an extent, and feels that Agamemnon could have prayed and requested that he not sacrifice his daughter.
Clytemnestra first demonstrates her own form of bravery by giving up all pride and begging Achilles to protect her child from cruel and untimely death. Clytemnestra responds to the messenger’s news that Iphigenia had been chosen by Artemis to live with the gods because of her “generous blood” and willingness to sacrifice herself. While the Chorus of Women seems to think this is a cause for rejoicing, Clytemnestra’s bitter diction “stolen” (1.1230) reveals her anger. She is defiant in her anger, even questioning the gods’ status: “What gods?” (1.1231). Clytemnestra’s bitterness at the end of the play foreshadows her murder of Agamemnon upon his return from the Trojan
In this essay I intend to discuss how Aeschylus presents Clytaemnestra in the Oresteia and how he marks the extent to which traits of Clytaemnestra's character remain defiantly unchanged as she manipulates events and characters around her. Clytaemnestra is the only character who appears in all three plays in the trilogy, but despite her immense stage presence she remains a troublesome character to interpret due to the highly ambiguous nature of her words. I intend to show that the key to unlocking Clytaemnestra's manly heart lies in the fact that she hated Agamemnon, not simply because he had killed her child, nor because she loved Aegisthus, but out of a jealousy that was not a jealously of Cassandra, but of Agamemnon himself and his status as a man. Therefore, I intend to show how Aeschylus presents Clytemnestra as a character who ventures throughout the Oresteia to fight, think and talk like a man, but also plot with the wiles of a woman, act the role of faithful wife, and argue with passionate conviction of a bereaved mother.
The portrayal of gender roles in William Shakespeare’s play Othello, demonstrates the inferior treatment of women and the certain stereotypes of men placed on them by society. Both the male and female characters in the play have these certain gender expectations placed on them. In a society dominated by men, it is understood that the women are to be seen rather than heard. The women are referred to and treated much like property. If indeed they do speak up, they are quickly silenced. One woman’s attempt to be the perfect wife is what ultimately led to her demise. The expectations of men are equally stereotypical. Men are to be leaders and to be in control and dominant especially over the women. The male characters compete for position and use the female characters in the play as leverage to manipulate each other. Shakespeare provides insight in understanding the outcomes of the men and women who are faced with the pressures of trying to live up to society’s expectations, not only in the workplace, but also in the home. The pressure creates jealousy issues amongst the men and they become blind to the voice of reason and are overtaken by jealous rage, leads to the death of many of the characters.
In Aeschylus’ The Agamemnon, Agamemnon and Clytemnestra have to make tough decisions throughout the play, decisions they believe are justified. The actions of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra are not justified because they are caused by their blinding hubris and desire for power. Agamemnon makes the choice to kill his daughter just so he could lead his troops to Troy. Clytemnestra kills her husband, not just for revenge, but for his position and power as king of Mycenae. They make selfish choices and do not believe they will be punished for them. By exposing their true motives, Aeschylus makes it clear they are not justified in their actions.
Klytaemnestra in Agamemnon is a strong and wilful woman, who relishes her part in the downfall of Agamemnon himself. She is proud of her action, accepts full responsibility for his death at her hands; she takes her vengeance against him for the death of Iphigeneia2. This is shown in lines such as 'I exult' (A 1417) and after she kills him, 'you think I'm some irresponsible woman?' (A 1425). Aeschylus uses her to embody the powerful 'heroic' ethic of vengeance - blood for blood.
Comparing the Portrayal of Clytemnestra in Agamemnon and Electra In both Electra and Agamemnon, Euripides and Aeschylus have chosen to represent Clytemnestra as a complex character being neither all bad nor all good - the signature of a sophisticated playwright. In Agamemnon, Clytemnestra is a morbidly obsessive woman, utterly consumed by the murder of her daughter for which the audience cannot help but sympathise; she is capable only of vengeance. In the Electra, Clytemnestra is placed in an even more sympathetic light, victimised by her own daughter who in turn is driven by an obsessive desire, similar to that of her mother's, to avenge her father's death.