Garrett Hardin's The Tragedy Of The Commons

2347 Words5 Pages

When surface water levels are low, farmers have long turned to groundwater as an important, and seemingly limitless, resource to sustain their crops. However, the growing human population and the improvements in technology, which make groundwater pumping easier and more widespread, are raising major concerns for groundwater depletion. The ongoing drought has exacerbated the current situation to a critical level. Groundwater levels have dropped hundreds of feet over the past few years, and it may take hundreds of years for an aquifer to replenish. The groundwater crisis is a prime example of what Garrett Hardin talks about in his essay, The Tragedy of the Commons, which explains how overuse of a shared resource can have detrimental effects for …show more content…

Due to its inevitable exploitation by society, this resource eventually becomes exhausted, leading to what Hardin calls the tragedy of the commons. The groundwater supply perfectly represents a commons as Hardin defines it. According to the National Groundwater Association, groundwater is the world’s most extracted raw material with an estimated withdrawal rate of 982 km3/year, 60% of which is used for agriculture worldwide. In the United States, the High Plains Aquifer System turned the once dry Great Plains into arable and profitable farmland, and Midwestern farmers have depended on this aquifer for decades. In California, farmers rely on groundwater as a strategic reserve during years of drought. A key point in Hardin’s definition of a commons is its unregulated nature, which makes it susceptible to exploitation. Groundwater pumping is still highly unregulated. Most California landowners are able to drill water wells without having to obtain permission from the government. In addition, it is not required for users to report how much they are pumping, and drilling records are highly restricted to the public (Nijhuis, 2014). Leading scientists postulate that without changes to current irrigation trends, nearly 70% of the resource could be depleted in the next half century, and once depleted, an “aquifer could take anywhere from 500 to 1,300 …show more content…

A rational human being will make a decision based on the relative weight of the costs and benefits to him or herself, and a self-interested person will disregard the effects of that decision on other people. Thus, when taking into account the nature of a commons, it is in the individual’s best interest to use the resource since all of the benefits are bestowed upon the user, while the costs fall upon all of society. This self-serving behavior is evidently detrimental to the collective interest. If every man were to act in a rational, self-interested manner, each using the commons without regards to the consequences, the result will be the ultimate devastation of the resource they all rely on. Therefore, it is in the interest of the community as a whole to preserve the commons. With regards to groundwater usage, farmers typically conclude that the benefits of growing more crops and earning more profit outweigh the costs of extracting more water from the basin and risking groundwater depletion. The price of corn has tripled since 2002 due to a rising demand for biofuels. Corn, a water-intensive crop, needs an average of 14 inches per acre to grow .Yet, despite this, “farmers have responded by increasing the acreage of irrigated cornfields by nearly a fifth” (Wines,

Open Document